|
At least check any fuses. Unplug first! F1, F2, … components on board near power cord input.
Also check external power adapter if it has its own. There was a trend for some years where monitors used external transformers so the displays could be thinner/lighter/etc.
I had a garage door opener with some pluggable fuses; two $5 fuses and it was back in business. Outage was from a nearby lightning strike that also took out a big TV. Big TV cost $150 to repair but was only a few years old, so I did it.
|
|
|
|
|
NO external transformer. Power cord direct to power surge suppressor
We are very rural community in the Mountains of Arizona
All the power is underground real surprise after living in growing up in Ohio
I still unplug with thunder storms. Bigger concern is lighting strikes
and fire 14 miles to the east of my house nothing but pine trees and the Apache cows
Thanks for the Advice
|
|
|
|
|
I made some Tetris wall art recently, and it only moves pieces randomly (though you can optionally control it via a connected PC's keyboard)
I wanted to make it strategize. How hard could it be, really?
[cs/0210020] Tetris is Hard, Even to Approximate[^]
Hard enough that it's an NP problem in many circumstances and there are research papers on the problem.
I didn't say it had to be good. But apparently even playing badly is almost as hard as playing well.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
I recently learned there's a whole community of tetris players who try to beat best scores.
Its was believed there was a best score x and after that pieces moved so fast that it was impossible to get it right.
That was until someone invented "tapping", where you could hit the buttons a lot faster.
Then they got to buggy levels because of some color schemes.
People got past that too.
This is how I learned: After 34 Years, Someone Finally Beat Tetris - YouTube[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastic video, thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
The old freeware Hyperoids changed your ship color each level.
If you made it to level 16, your ship would match the background! Maybe the bullets as well.
A lot harder situation with Tetris!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 X/6*
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
Another one of those!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 X/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
Same here.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 6/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 6/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Yep one of those.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 6/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I was just slightly luckier ... hate it when that happens!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Same here.
And that terminated my streak, I was fortunate to reach 100 yesterday.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles]
The Windows 11 taskbar is a disgrace; a third-party add-on is needed to reverse the deterioration. I decline such a downgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 5/6
🟨⬛🟨⬛⬛
🟩🟨⬛🟩⬛
🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛
🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
wordle.at
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
MessageBox.Show(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature)
? $"This is my signature:{Environment.NewLine}{_signature}": "404-Signature not found");
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 6/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Yeah, me too almost lost that one there...
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 3/6
⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 990 6/6
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Whether by bag, or backpack, or shoulder or car
In any weather, and wherever you are
This little orange kitten loves to travel with you
To adventure and play, and her name is Minou
Orange shoulder kitten![^]
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
I was expecting a cat “tamagotchi” based on earlier posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
your cat? I have a dream of one day picking out my own pet. All I get are hand me downs from the children - who have been told it will never happen again.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I love closures and lambdas, but I was quite amused when I wrote the following buggy code:
for (int i=0; i <= 10; i++)
{
var task = Task.Run(async () =>
{
var convertResp = await StartTestConvert(i);
... other stuff
});
} And was wondering, how in the world does i get equal to 11!!!
Answer: bad closure. Fix:
for (int i=0; i <= 10; i++)
{
int n = i;
var task = Task.Run(async () =>
{
var convertResp = await StartTestConvert(n);
... other stuff
});
}
I think this would make a good interview question!
modified 4-Mar-24 10:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I think this would make a good interview question!
And I thought this was fairly common knowledge!
(Not that that would preclude it from being an interview question, of course.)
They "fixed" the behaviour for the foreach loop back in C# 5, but deliberately chose not to change the for loop:
UPDATE: We are taking the breaking change. In C# 5, the loop variable of a foreach will be logically inside the loop, and therefore closures will close over a fresh copy of the variable each time. The for loop will not be changed.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That's the follow-up interview question. "On what for loops does closure work?"
|
|
|
|
|
From my experience there are most probably programmers who would fix it like this
for (int i = 0; i <= 10; System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10), i++)
{
....
}
|
|
|
|