|
About politicians is always hard to say...
Are they really that dumb?
or is it just that they know, don't give a crap about it or about us and their only ultimative goal is to fill their pockets or to leave "their print" due to a ill ego?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Some of both. It doesn't matter their leanings either.
|
|
|
|
|
This new code preview introduces the ability to not only preview your code search results, but also make edits to your code all within the All-In-One Search UI Those we found we fixed, what we didn't find, we kept.
With all respect to Homer and his fishing friends.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a big difference between fluent speech and fluent thought. For those who thought I was human
|
|
|
|
|
It'll be in for a real shocker when it encounters humans with fluid speech.
|
|
|
|
|
Zero trust troubles and more ransomware regulation also make tech analyst Gartner's list of factors you need to plan for. There are hackers out there?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: There are hackers out there?
As long as they don't get in here... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm thinking that #8 "Cybersecurity will matter for the CEO's bonus" will never happen or, if it does, it will be "smoke and mirrors" just like most other CEO bonus criteria. Whatever happens will be defined as success and the CEO will get the bonus. If a security incident happens, a scapegoat, other than the CEO, will be found.
|
|
|
|
|
Sad, but true... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Space boffins task engineers with creating 40kW lunar fission plant that can operate for ten years Careful - those things have been known to explode and throw the moon hurtling through space
|
|
|
|
|
Does that mean that the Moon we see is a fake? 
I'm shocked, shocked!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
As all the moon landing people know, it is just a clever projection from a Hollywood studio!
|
|
|
|
|
Since 1999, yes.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: those things have been known to explode and throw the moon hurtling through space
I thought towards earth... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
4g, for the hd stream,
but will HBO Max be available? Or Paramount Plus.
|
|
|
|
|
The ideas back then were simple: fix the culture. Since then, the term has taken on a life of its own. We now have “DevOps Engineer” as a job title. Let's give it a new name and try again
|
|
|
|
|
As an economy matures, specialization increases. Managers who think employees should be jacks-of-all-trades are ignorant of this simple fact and will create an organization in which no one is a master at anything. The problem is communication, not specialization. DevOps proponents are unfit to manage chips wagons.
|
|
|
|
|
The original title "Do everything I don't want to do" wasn't alluring.
|
|
|
|
|
Google is encouraging all companies to introduce anonymous code review to remove bias in reviews that cost it lost developer hours. Because the only way people are going to know that's my code is if I sign it
The bugs are incidental
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The results from the extension experiment showed that review times and review quality appeared consistent with and without anonymous review. They also found that, for certain types of review, it was more difficult for reviewers to guess the code's author.
Consistent with what? If anonymous reviews were consistent with ones where the author is known; that would mean that non-white male developers still received more pushback on changes than white men did. That in turn would mean either the anonymization somehow failed, or that the higher rates of pushback the other groups of devs received actually was valid, not BS. Neither of those conclusions fit with the rest of the article. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
Deducing this (P0847) is a C++23 feature which gives a new way of specifying member functions. This!
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
That is what we must all deduce, apparently
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
It is actually covered pretty well in the article. It seems to mainly be for esoteric library writers, to eliminate duplicated code on type.
|
|
|
|
|
It may have good reasons, but when a language tries to be all things to all people, it inevitably fails. PL/1 tried to be that, and is not used much today.
There must be some ideal level of complexity between C89 and C++23, but reasonable people may differ. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
