|
We hope you enjoy the new features highlighted from some of teams such as C++, .NET Productivity, Address Sanitizer, XAML Tooling, and IntelliCode teams. "You could blow with this, or you could blow with that"
It's going to be a little obvious there's a Microsoft conference going on today.
|
|
|
|
|
The .NET Upgrade Assistant is a .NET global command-line tool that gives you a guided experience for incrementally upgrading your applications. "It'll do magic believe it or not. Bibbidi-bobbidi-boo."
Pity for all the Wizards out of work these days.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Update C# source. Now that all your projects have been upgraded to .NET 5 and references upgraded when the tool could help, it’s time to make some specific fixes to the C# code. Right now, the tool offers a set of ASP.NET analyzers, which will apply fixes for known patterns that where in .NET Framework that have .NET 5 equivalents. You can pick and choose the analyzers you want to run on your code or run all of them to catch any usages of older .NET Framework patterns. Some examples for ASP.NET include:
- Apply fix for AM0001: ASP.NET Core projects should not reference ASP.NET namespaces
- Apply fix for AM0002: HtmlString types should be replaced with Microsoft.AspNetCore.Html.HtmlString
- Apply fix for AM0003: ActionResult types should come from the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc namespace
Reporting "I have no idea how to fix this problem" to the the first bullet point here was the biggest reason I rolled my eyes at MS's previous tool as being a useless joke.
Although I'm not working on it anymore, I'm going to have to find a bit of my own time to try running the .netframework web app I used to support through the new tool and see if it actually does enough to make planning an upgrade plausible.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Tattoos are usually considered a form of personal expression, but a team of researchers in Europe have created what they’re calling the world’s first light-emitting tattoo based on OLED screen technology that, besides presumably looking kind of cool, could also serve as a visible warning about potential health concerns. "And I just love your flashy ways"
edit: added the missing quote from the article 
modified 1-Mar-21 16:44pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The important question: How much does it cost to have it removed? 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like tattoos but a flashing neon tattoo? That's so cyber, I want many.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
No picture of an actual tattoo. Color me disappointed.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
Gizmodo Scientists have invented light-up OLED tattoos stickers with delusions of grandeur
FTFY
If you're older than about 15 (and I'm being really charitable here); temporary tattoos aren't.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Well, following my mind where it always goes (given the slightest excuse or making up one of its own):
These could be found as very useful should a more experienced girlfriend be in the dark with her currently virginal boyfriend. You know - sort of like landing strip guides, maybe a little messaging like "IT'S OVER HERE !". You can see what I mean (in your minds eye, at least).
And note that in our current world of the young who's entire social life seems to be via a tiny hand-held device, this is now idle concept !
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
The claims for Avida — a software program that is supposed to “evolve” solutions via neo-Darwinian evolution — fail the most basic test Because it's not even intelligently designed?
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it has to run for a million years. 
|
|
|
|
|
Mutations in nature still have "rules" they must follow. You aren't going to have a child that has a random gene replaced with a cheeseburger. I can't speak to whether this software actually does anything or whether it's buzzword funding bait, but the refutation here is very lacking in my opinion.
The most interesting part is the article bio:
has written extensively on how code and software systems evidence intelligent design in biological systems
Now that's a unique premise. One that would be blown to pieces if the software's claims were true.
|
|
|
|
|
Google tops Amazon, Microsoft and Apple on the trustworthy scores. Meanwhile, Facebook and TikTok were the most distrusted. "The trust of the innocent is the liar's most useful tool."
|
|
|
|
|
What? Are you telling that the "do no evil" is not true?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Google more trusted than Microsoft and Apple?! None are saints, but Google is simply evil.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Google tops Amazon, Microsoft and Apple on the trustworthy scores. Meanwhile, Facebook and TikTok were the most distrusted.
What, people trust any of them!? Good grief.
|
|
|
|
|
Asking who you would have trusted in the late 1930s would be hitling the tread.
(Maybe I am doing now, by simply pointing out the possibility.)
|
|
|
|
|
I'll go with something like:
"Standard Oil, Zeppelin companies least trusted, Philip Morris most trusted"
Except in their ongoing attempt to spoil my jokes, I learned that Standard Oil was broken up before the 30s. bother.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
trønderen wrote: Asking who you would have trusted in the late 1930s
In terms of companies and governments, none at all (assuming for the sake of argument I was then the person I am now).
|
|
|
|
|
Using a single laser, scientists have built a new system that generates random numbers fast and at scale. Now I can roll for initiative and blast my enemies at the same time!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Now I can roll for initiative and blast my enemies at the same time!
Be careful you don't get a blackout... that would be a critical fail
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is believed to be working on a new virtualized desktop experience called 'Cloud PC' to help administrators deploy and manage Windows 10 PCs in the cloud via web browser, mobile app or another PC. "I see the PC becoming more powerful, not less powerful"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: o help administrators deploy and manage Windows 10 PCs in the cloud via web browser, mobile app or another PC.
I have a déjà-vu[^]... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Do they count as hacks if they get invited in? 
It's either that, or you're a True Prophet(tm)!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Do they count as hacks if they get invited in?
Is an open door (or two or three) an invitation?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
