|
An upcoming movie will take the concept of robotic acting to an entirely new level. She is type-cast as a robot though
Arnold wasn't available?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Arnold wasn't available?
He has the robot part down perfectly. Perhaps he wasn't willing to declare as a female? 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
This will de-volve into porns featuring sex-robots looking like whomever the hot actress of the day is.
... and give new meaning to the still-new term, "Deep Fake"
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
OMG... that's creepy.
The robot looks as the head were turned around 180° like the girl on the exorcism 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems the creators trained it to behave as human as possible - so what the point? Let the robot be a robot, that will be much more fun...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Some actresses and actors are robots already.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Three Republican senators introduced a bill this week to codify "lawful access," a legal framework that would allow law enforcement to access encrypted digital devices with signed court orders. Apparently, gentlemen *do* read each other's mail
Yeah, a little political, and only just proposed legislation.
Sorry.
But as this is even caused a minor discussion in my inbox, I think it's worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
I was expecting it since the beginning of that situation with Apple saying "no" to the enforcements law last time.
With the promise of security trying to get give some steps in the direction of control.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: "Tech companies' increasing reliance on encryption has turned their platforms into a new, lawless playground of criminal activity," Cotton said in a statement. "Criminals from child predators to terrorists are taking full advantage. This bill will ensure law enforcement can access encrypted material with a warrant based on probable cause and help put an end to the Wild West of crime on the Internet."
BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Tom Cotton is an idiot if he thinks this is going to put even a small dent into crime on the 'net.
Wait. I should have removed the "if". He ranks at the bottom of the intelligence spectrum in Congress, right there with Louie Gohmert. Lindsey Graham is no different, with his allegiance going to the highest bidder and thinking nobody notices his flip-flopping stances.
With all the open source implementations of crypto out there, what's to stop someone from building their own encrypted, under the radar platforms? NOTHING! It has already happened!
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: With all the open source implementations of crypto out there, what's to stop someone from building their own encrypted, under the radar platforms? NOTHING! It has already happened!
Like back in the day with PGP - Phil Zimmerman was pretty much considered an international terrorist for that.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: With all the open source implementations of crypto out there
Well, then of course there have to be laws to make open source crypto implementations illegal!
But seriously, the Russia-collusion hoax proves that they can lie to the courts and get warrants without any probable cause, so warrants mean nothing these days.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
this will not end well....
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has collaborated with Harvard University’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science to create a first-of-its-kind open-source platform for differential privacy. The technology will allow researchers to preserve user privacy while performing analysis on datasets. In case you need to keep your differential private?
Are people exposing other's transmissions on the internet now?
|
|
|
|
|
As long as they don't leave the DB with the raw data open to the WWW... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
GitHub has redesigned its web repository layout for an "improved mobile web experience", but developers were quick to find flaws in the new approach. Cheese was moved
|
|
|
|
|
Amazing! I thought it was just me, being old and such!
(and a gamer too, gamer like their PC)
Long Live PC Master Race! 
|
|
|
|
|
Article said: GitHub said that its new design has three key features. First, a responsive layout to improve usability on mobile web browsers.
Because there are tons of serious devs who are accessing GitHub from mobile web browsers. 
Imagine developing code from a mobile device...no, wait...don't. It'll make you cringe too much to even think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: Because there are tons of serious devs who are accessing GitHub from mobile web browsers.
They will still have to try it harder to even get close to Window 8 and all its follo-ups 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
What, has GitHub hired Sinofsky?
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the features are now in the product, but some are not yet in their final state. We expect that the release will be feature-complete with Preview 8. Because it's been over two weeks since the last time you got to install a preview build
"We announced support for Windows ARM64 as part of Preview 4. At that time, we had only enabled console and ASP.NET Core apps on Windows ARM64. The Preview 6 SDK now includes support for Windows Forms. That means you can build and run Windows Forms apps on Windows ARM64 devices, just like you would on x64. We’re still working on adding support for WPF on Windows ARM64."
WinForms and WPF were that tightly bundled to Win32 on Intel?
|
|
|
|
|
Exciting! 
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't mind I will turn around and continue sleeping.
Would you mind to wake me up when Service Pack 1 is out there?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm.....
Quote: Removal of built-in WinRT support in .NET 5.0
[...]
More recently, we’ve been working closely with[...]
WinRT interop can be developed and improved separate from the .NET runtime.
I've seen announcement like this before. So which one is going to be deprecated... or re-prioritised, or downplayed?
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft's Defender ATP Research Team today issued guidance on how to defend against attacks targeting Exchange servers by blocking malicious activity identified with the help of behavior-based detection. Are they also emailing the instructions to fix?
|
|
|
|
|
In a word file, linking to a excell with VBA and Macros that call an autoextracted zip-file with .exe extension.
And someone will open everything for sure 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
