|
It's not a matter of right or wrong, it's reality. I've also worked with countless agile teams and this is always how it has been with testing. If you are saying you have worked with dozens of teams and they haven't had this issue then I find that hard to believe.
|
|
|
|
|
Believe what you like, but if testing is properly integrated as part of the sprint, and you've got professional testers and continuous testing, there is no reason (other than tests failing, which you can hardly blame on the testers, and which should be planned for) why testing should be a bottleneck.
Problems with sprints being improperly planned can't be blamed on the testers, either. Everyone knows that everything has to be tested, so no-one has any excuse if there isn't time for testing or if devs are twiddling their thumbs waiting for tests.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I explained in my reply to the OP why testing becomes a bottleneck. The fact that this article was written in the first place is because testing becomes a bottleneck. Again I'm not saying what is right or wrong, I'm just saying what happens in the real world, something these "advice" articles never address.
|
|
|
|
|
This article exemplifies one of the problems with agile. All of the advice given for "real" problems is theoretical, it doesn't work in the real world with real people. The advice in this article would work if you have a team of developers, some of who are in charge of testing, but that is never the case. In the real world testers are people that have fallen into the job with no real technical expertise, certainly no programming skills. Obviously that's not always the case, in my career I have seen one or two testers that got into writing automated tests but it's definitely the exception and not the norm.
So you have a developer that develops, then while the testers are testing the developer works on the next ticket, then at the end of the sprint all development is done and the devs do nothing while the testers are testing. If you want to solve this problem then don't give advice on what testers can be doing, that's tackling it from the wrong direction as testers can rarely even tie their own shoes....you need to give advice on what developers can be doing while testers are testing.
|
|
|
|
|
So don't hire testers who can't create automated tests.
It's a major part of the job, so why on Earth hire people who can't do it?
You might as well hire devs who don't know any programming languages (e.g. straight from university).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: So don't hire testers who can't create automated tests.
That's just not practical, the majority of testers can't.
Let me guess though...all the testers you know are also coders 
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: Let me guess though...all the testers you know are also coders
Some, but by no means all. they're just people who are good at their job -- you know, the kind of people that you give jobs to.
If you're working with testers (and maybe planners, from the looks of it) who can't do the job, either get 'em trained up or get 'em transferred to jobs they can do.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Again you're talking about best-case scenarios. Obviously if you can hire nothing but the top talent then you have less problems...who doesn't want to do that? I'm talking about the real world though, which is why a lot of the "advice" given on agile isn't much use, as it ignores how things really are.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't say "top talent". If you don't hire people who are competent to do the job they are hired to do, you've got no right to complain when they don't do it.
I don't see having competent staff as a "best-case scenario"; I see it as "business as usual".
And I'm somewhat dumbfounded that you can think otherwise.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say testers that can do automated tests are "top talent", yes, as the vast majority can't. Again I'm talking about the real world here.
|
|
|
|
|
That ain't no real world you're living in. You must have done some really bad things, when you were alive.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: That ain't no real world you're living in
Where not every employee has a huge range of skills? Ok boomer.
|
|
|
|
|
Swift on more platforms – provided you do not need a GUI "And the haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate"
Dang, but their headline writer is so good. I'm jealous.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Dang, but their headline writer is so good. I'm jealous.
Not so hot on accuracy in tech initialisms, though -- it's IDE, not GUI.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
While I assume it's the case that the tool stack doesn't support anything more advanced in the way of an IDE than a texteditor syntax highlight plugin; the article itself is talking about the lack of a GUI library; because SwiftUI is a thin wrapper on top of native Apple controls; and doesn't have any sane porting path to Windows. (Just like there's no sane native way to do WinForms/WPF with .net on *NIX.)
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
According to the scientists, if these waves were harnessed, the concentrated power could potentially serve as an alternate energy source. Is it getting hot in here, or are you charging your phone?
Weren't there "T-rays" in Flash Gordon or Quatermass or something?
|
|
|
|
|
So all you need is to tape a 5lb block of graphene to your phone and add fifty quid's worth of electrics, and you're good to go!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Studio 2019 version 16.6 Preview 2 comes with several new, exciting capabilities for you to try today. I see their naming game is still on point
|
|
|
|
|
Let me guess download is 50 GB in size...
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
abmv wrote: Let me guess download is 50 GB in size...
That would be light...
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And that's just the delta since Preview 1
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Today, Microsoft announced the new Microsoft Editor, an intelligent AI-powered writing assistant that is designed for all of us to become better writers. "This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
Time to sell that Grammarly stock
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Time to sell that Grammarly stock
Or to buy Stock of those indian essay writers... I suppose they are going to receive a lot of requests even if they stop spaming
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
On a related note - I've been enjoying the lack of telephone solicitors for the last week or so.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Today, Microsoft announced the new Microsoft Editor the "release/existence/whatever of" the editor was announced, an intelligent missing comma AI-powered writing assistant missing comma that is designed for all of inappropriate phrasing us to become better writers. Whether "whether" can only be used with two options you are a student, professional writer, or just writing some needless word casual chats to your friends, Microsoft says the new service will help you write better papers, craft more thoughtful emails missing comma or incorrect conjunction: use "and" help with your professional posts on sites like LinkedIn.
At launch, the Microsoft Editor will be available in 20 languages and anyone who uses a Microsoft sign-in "the Microsoft Editor will be available in [...] anyone who uses a Microsoft sign-in" does not make sense. Recast.
I can't wait.
Let's just repeat one bit of that:Quote: Microsoft says the new service will help you write better
Is it any surprise to anyone that microsoft is completely wrong, yet again?
Wanna take a guess at what makes people better writers?
(tip: it ain't a stupid software package that makes inappropriate suggestions for changes to what you type.)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
