|
I can't read the article unless I create an account to subscribe.
No thanks.
I am sure it was a good article. 
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about that. I will edit the post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can tell the people with real experience from the recent grads by looking at their skill sets, and their recent job positions should reflect those listed skill sets.
It should be obvious that someone who lists a position was "Assistant Manager at Dairy Queen" within the last five years is not an experienced developer.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
But in some places they might be hired to manage experienced developers. Workers are, after all, nothing more than "resources", are they not?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Workers are, after all, nothing more than "resources"
Or more likely, "slaves".
|
|
|
|
|
the article has no point.written as if to promote the two time winner of the "queens award" .. yes u will see lot of consumers of online academies for learning code......and soon you will find the new generation of people learning to code using Facebook,Instagram and pin interest... and YouTube.....you will find code influencers.. you can dm them to promote your JavaScript framework... code djs.. devop devas... JavaScript baristas....rust pizza maker... react doctors....sql fixers...cloud angels.....
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
The career path for a developer is usually pretty clear. None of the architects I've worked with seemed to suffer from it
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: The career path for a developer is usually pretty clear.
It was clear to me:
0) Maintain an outstanding work ethic
1) Avoid specializing in any single technology
2) Try to stay relevant
3) Do it as a hobby (allows you to try new tech without corrupting production code at work)
3) Avoid the urge to introduce "cutting edge" code at work
4) Most importantly, stay out of management roles
I've been a developer for over 40 years with no management time beyond being a team lead. That's been my self-defined career path.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
does empathy and what the customer wants match ?
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
One of the things researchers have discovered is that there are limits to how quickly quantum information can race across any quantum device. It's not just the speed limit, it's the Lieb-Robinson bounds
|
|
|
|
|
Wake me up, when they reach the Ludicrous Speed 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Report demands that the government cleans up its act with technology or risk huge IT bills and damaging cyberattacks. Spend a little, save a lot?
|
|
|
|
|
If the new systems were better... But one only have to read this forum to see that being new is no warranty for being secure. Sadly 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Report demands that the government
A stunning example of role reversal and wishful thinking.
Quote: A recent analysis by government security indicates that almost 50% of current government IT spend (£2.3b out of a total central Government spend of £4.7bn in 2019) is dedicated to "keeping the lights on" activity on outdated legacy systems...
If you think it's bad now, wait until you see the spend for replacing those legacy systems.
|
|
|
|
|
What percent of those 'legacy systems' could continue on long into the future if the software running them was updated? My guess is it would cost a LOT less to do that coding work and share it than it would to replace those systems. Obsolescence by design makes me angry, and is sickening knowing the state of the world right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I incorrectly assumed that the software, more so than the hardware, was the problem. The budget for replacing hardware should be fairly predictable, but initiatives to rewrite legacy software are often debacles. You should see what happened when the Canadian federal government decided to overhaul its payroll system, and that's penny ante compared to some US Department of Offense fiascos.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I'm wrong, but my guess is that it is mainly caused by older systems that can't run anything newer than Windows XP. If the underlying OS was updated without forcing obsolescence of the hardware, than a majority of the software systems you are talking about could continue running. (Unless the non-OS programs are inherently insecure themselves, which may be the case, and I would be wrong.)
|
|
|
|
|
Most cases involved snooping on other people and handing over data to third parties. Just?
|
|
|
|
|
mmmm.... I think I am lost.
Kent Sharkey wrote: Most cases involved snooping on other people and handing over data to third parties.
Is that not Google's usual business?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, my. How did I not get that one? Thank you for your brilliance.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome.
And thank you 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
While some organizations such as Google and Microsoft want to kill off passwords, it's not an easy task considering that it's a traditional form of authentication used heavily by almost all online services. Boris is {you pick the third one}
|
|
|
|
|
passwordpasswordpassword it is then.
|
|
|
|
|
The worst BJ.
(That was a placard someone was holding up in a demonstration against Boris Johnson. I saw a photo of that.)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
