|
[*sigh*]
Again, they avoid mentioning that 93.7% (+/- 0.0001%) of android Internet access is background activity, and has nothing to do with browsers.
Everyone I know opens web pages in android browsers only if they won't have access to a computer soon enough -- and most people would rather walk 50 yards and open a browser on windows than use a phone browser.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers from the ARC Centre for Ultrahigh bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems (CUDOS) in the University of Sydney's Australian Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology have made a breakthrough achieving radio frequency signal control at sub-nanosecond time scales optical device. Because I can't get enough pew pew on my network
|
|
|
|
|
I tried running the article through google Greek-->English, but it was still pretty much unreadable.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, Chris suggested that one. I think we need to be on his level to understand it. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
<Comment redacted by the snark police>
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
A new attack that uses terrestrial radio signals to hack a wide range of Smart TVs raises an unsettling prospect—the ability of hackers to take complete control of a large number of sets at once without having physical access to any of them. Beware of people driving by your house with TV transmitters?
|
|
|
|
|
|
So what's new?
Dr. Evil, the Mandarin, etc, have been using that for ages.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Just when we learned the importance of HTTPS in address bars, spammers and malicious hackers have figured out how to game the system. Why we can't have nice stuff, part 443
|
|
|
|
|
Told ya so.
Back when SMTP was invented, the marketing scum pounced on it because it was a free way for them to mass distribute their spam and viruses. Now email traffic is over 80% spam.
Anytime you make something free, like Letsencrypt has done, the criminals will lap it up like puppies. Letsencrypt are completely responsible for this mess that they have created.
Back when SSL costed $300 a year cybercriminals would almost never spend that money...
Oh well, I'm wasting my breath. Bring on the criminals. That's our world now.
|
|
|
|
|
The solution is to set LetsEncrypt as an un-trusted CA.
I think it's better if people start doing that sooner, rather than later.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
That is the only solution at this point.
What is surprising is that the major browsers are trusting this CA which does not validate certificates. There is no checking of credentials, business details, policing of the OBVIOUS phishing urls - NONE. None at all.
Just here, free certs!
The mind boggles.
They need to be sued.
|
|
|
|
|
Basildane wrote: Just here, free certs!The mind boggles.
It's total craziness.
Like allowing a known criminal organization to start a bank. "Sure, bring your money in and we'll keep it safe in our vaults for free. Sure we will."
|
|
|
|
|
There were always certs issued to phishing sites, that's nothing new. Only the scale is new.
|
|
|
|
|
While this is true, if analytics has taught us anything, it's that just scale provides a hell of a lot of power.
A CA should follow up on reports of fraudulent activity. This is how it's always worked, and verified malicious activity is generally rewarded with a revocation of certificates.
That's not how LetsEncrypt operates, nor can they, thanks to the scale of the problem.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
It's not an "s" that makes a site secure. At the very least one must use a decent browser (i.e. not IE) and check the address bar and title bar. If something looks strange about the site double check the IP with other DNS and some historical data (I keep my bank IPs on a text file just in case). Technology is not a substitute for brain.
When the 'S' in HTTPS also stands for shady Please stand up!
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Technology is not a substitute for brain.
What!?!
It is a substitute for Intelligence though, right?
Augmented? Artificial? 
|
|
|
|
|
Natural stupidity beats artificial intelligence anytime.
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Technology is not a substitute for brain.
mandatory[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Once you understand how easy and common it is for thieves to attach “skimming” devices to ATMs and other machines that accept debit and credit cards, it’s difficult not to closely inspect and even tug on the machines before using them. Security through yankery
|
|
|
|
|
Comcast Corp, Verizon Communications Inc and AT&T Inc said Friday they would not sell customers’ individual internet browsing information, days after the U.S. Congress approved legislation reversing Obama administration era internet privacy rules. Rent?
|
|
|
|
|
Related: Trump signs bill rolling back FCC privacy rules for ISPs[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Rent?
Exactly.
Customers' personal details as a service is a much more profitable model.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Whilst writing a previous blog post I stumbled across the .NET Interpreter, tucked away in the source code. So you can replace all that pesky JavaScript code?
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft today announced that it’s shutting down CodePlex, its service for hosting repositories of open source software. The service launched in 2006, and now it will be going away on December 15. Code-what now?
Launched in 2006, and I think this might be the first time I've heard it used in a sentence.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
