|
After Brexit the UK just wants to Sexit (Security Exit)?
I'm guessing they won't stop until they've had the entire alphabet.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: the UK just wants to Sexit
No sex please, we're British!
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: After Brexit the UK just wants to Sexit
Secshit surely, because that's what any security will be with built in backdoors.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's not only you—some user interfaces today intentionally want to confuse and enroll. Click here if you don't not want to see the article
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Click here if you don't not want to see the article
I'm clicking but nothing is happening. Is this thing on?
|
|
|
|
|
Don't not click harder!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I won't continue to stop trying, but I can't say I'm not expecting something eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh not a lot very impressive - you speak DarkTalk already not in spite but I don't want to learn it too not ...
|
|
|
|
|
Sweeney goes into detail about his fears that Microsoft wants to make old desktop games and Steam inconvenient to use and position the Windows Store as the only source for new titles. Oh, did the Windows team take over development of Steam?
Yes, I read the article. I just thought that might be the best answer to the title.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is broke, and has been for years. Cannot get a good OS implementation for a small device. They had an opportunity to start with the PDA's but blew it. Started over again when they wanted to enter the phone market. They should have put priority on creating a small OS back in the PDA days, and if they had succeeded, they would have dominated the market.
|
|
|
|
|
Clifford Nelson wrote: Microsoft is broke, and has been for years. Financially?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
No not financially yet but they may yet go the way of Sun, and Lotus, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't that what every competitor does? And it is a really annoying statement from him, he should consider making it a strong framework for games and give promotions; I might use one for Batman: Arkham Knight.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Steam has been putting in extra hours making their software irritating, they don't need help from anyone else.
This is the kind of crap executives say when they've gone nothing. What's the last "epic" thing Epic has done? I can't think of one.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft doesn't want Steam to be buggy and broken; it just doesn't care about the platform that Steam is built on (and forgets that programs such as the Steam Client exist). It's also been badly managing the Windows Store, for that matter. Sweeney mistakes Microsoft incompetence for malice.
If they ever do come up with an evil plot, it will be to turn all games into cloud-based productivity tools hosted on Azure that turn people into corporations who pay consistent hosting fees and keep investors happy.
|
|
|
|
|
It’s more than four times as nutritious as cow’s milk and, the researchers think it could be the key to feeding our growing population in the future. "Scientists" should go right ahead (without me)
|
|
|
|
|
and at the same time.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I think William Burroughs should be reanimated and commissioned to design the cockroach dairy, sounds just like something from one of his novels.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
..just a day after I read that superfoods aren't that super
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Today I learned that cockroaches have milk.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RUMPEL gives users the ability to browse their very own private and secure 'personal data wardrobe' -- called a HAT (Hub-of-all-Things) -- which collates data about them held on the internet (eg on social media, calendars and their own smartphones, with the possibility of also including shopping, financial and other personal data) and allows them to control, combine and share it in whatever way they wish. Isn't that what Outlook is for?
|
|
|
|
|
PowerShell is an automation platform and scripting language for Windows and Windows Server that allows you to simplify the management of your systems. It appears now, though, that Microsoft may be making moves to open sourcing the scripting language. Entirely a coincidence this is happening after Windows gets Bash
|
|
|
|
|
The MVVM design pattern has been around for quite a while now. It has a lot of strengths when done correctly. But, I believe the time has come to recognize that MVVM has a lot of shortcomings that point to its demise. Already? I only just learned what the second 'V' was for. Now I'll never learn about that last 'M'
|
|
|
|
|
Actually the performance bottleneck he speaks of with Angular is quickly becoming moot as the whole loop thing is being phased out. And not every framework relies on that. Granted, it does increase processing time, but using an MV* framework isn't nearly as bad as this guy makes it out to be. To me it sounds like he's ill-experienced.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
From the article:
"It sounds great. And when it works it is. But that’s the main problem, it hardly ever works well."
"You try it on some small application and you get excited. Like a gateway drug, it lures you in. And when you finally go to implement it on some larger application, you find out that it really doesn’t scale all that well."
This describes a lot of things even outside design patterns. Many things which work great on a one-off test with highly dedicated people end up being terrible when applied generally. A big reason is that with the small experiment, everything can be controlled. Things quickly unravel beyond that. (Confirmation bias also plays a huge part--you want it to work and dismiss or ignore the problems.)
|
|
|
|