|
Dan Neely wrote: de gustibus non est disputandum scilicet!!
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
OneDrive is expanding version history to support all file types for your OneDrive personal account—one of our most highly requested features. For all your, "Undo, undo, UNDO, please undo" moments
|
|
|
|
|
Developers can easily document large JavaScript projects with sphinx-js, Mozilla’s newly introduced solution. According to the company, there hasn’t been a tool able to handle large JavaScript documentation projects up until today. Is it a sign with a big, "DON'T" on it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
That site is brilliant.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
|
There’s no other way to put this, QNAP do not believe that a bug which risks corrupting your data on your QNAP NAS is worthwhile mentioning in their release notes at all.
...
We use StorageCraft ShadowProtect a lot for our client backups. It’s been proven to be a solid backup and recovery solution for us for many years. We typically store these backups onsite on QNAP devices with 4 drives in a RAID 5 configuration. Now in “normal” operation this works well. It’s only if a drive in the RAID array fails however did the QNAP device then have to resort to recalculate the missing data, and when it does that it makes errors in the calculations but does not tell you about it. These errors cause the data to be corrupted. Sure – you replace the failed drive, and it then used the same calculations to repopulate the failed drive, with corrupted data. Basically if you have a QNAP with a RAID 5 array AND you have a drive fail, you WILL HAVE an issue with data corruption
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Wizards of the Coast describes D&D Beyond as a “digital toolset” for players using the game’s 5th Edition rules. Roll D20 to save against buying
OK, maybe that's just for me.
Mind you, a digital version of RuneQuest? I'd be so there.
Wait, there's a NEW edition?! bye y'all
|
|
|
|
|
It is surprising that the publisher is just now getting to the 'digital edition' as it were... I remember writing applications for D&D in the early '80s on a Commodore PET.
|
|
|
|
|
Eh, doesn't surprise me. They stopped listening to people after 3.5 I feel. 4th edition was garbage and I haven't looked much into 5th edition yet. I just play PathfinderRPG (a revamp of 3.5) with some rules modded back to 3.5. Also the Giant In the Playground[^] forum has already come up with excellent online rules they've been using for years. The official digital edition is a bit behind the times.
|
|
|
|
|
My son, who is a great DM, really likes 5th edition. I'm also surprised they are getting on the bandwagon so late, especially since there's numerous sites like roll20 out there.
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
I'll have to check out 5th edition. I heard they moved away from 4th's board-game-esque combat system which was one of the things I disliked about 4th. I still like 3.5's level of customization which I don't think they brought back but house-ruling a combination of 3.5 and 5 could be a fun adventure.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if the licensing terms for the DND based RPGs they did back in the day got in the way of them being able to make an official play online product.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
It’s summertime here at IEEE Spectrum, and that means it’s time for our fourth interactive ranking of the top programming languages. They're engineers, so it must be correct. Right?
I'm sorry, but a list of top languages with Forth only at #47? For shame!
|
|
|
|
|
I read the most used language in programming was profanity. Seems to be missing on the list.
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes people have a very hard time debugging. Mostly, these are people who believe that in order to debug a system, you have to think about it instead of looking at it. I know none of you need this skill, but you might know someone who does
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty obvious stuff. But he's correct: the right answer is "I don't know" and "I'll go look at ... and figure it out."
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm.
Sometimes people have a very hard time debugging. Mostly, these are people who believe that in order to debug a system, you have to think about it instead of looking at it.
The thing I do when faced with a bug that looks like those nasty things in colorized electron microscope images is think about it. Because there is no easy answer to:
Debugging is accomplished by gathering data until you understand the cause of the problem.
These are bugs caused not so much by data but by threading issues, workflow problems, lack of understanding the underlying tech, etc. Yes, there's a "data gathering" aspect in the broad sense of the term, but I've found that the really gnarly bugs are solved best by sleeping on the problem -- relaxing the mind, imagining the processes involved and how they interact, and coming up with some ways to simplify the problem down to a testable scenario that verifies the bug.
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: When you start debugging, realize that you do not already know the answer. Self-rerential platitude.Quote: However, most of the time, you will spend hours, days, or weeks guessing the answer and trying different fixes with no result other than complicating the code. Ludicrous extrapolation from fantasized worst case to modal case.Quote: But getting back to the process of debugging itself, what should you do? Guessing is a waste of time, imagining reasons for the problem is a waste of time—basically most of the activity that happens in your mind when first presented with the problem is a waste of time. Nonsense.
I wonder if this erstwhile pundit has heard the words "work-around" ?
«Differences between Big-Endians, who broke eggs at the larger end, and Little-Endians gave rise to six rebellions: one Emperor lost his life, another his crown. The Lilliputian religion says an egg should be broken on the convenient end, which is now interpreted by the Lilliputians as the smaller end. Big-Endians gained favor in Blefuscu.» J. Swift, 'Gulliver's Travels,' 1726CE
|
|
|
|
|
However, I've often witnessed other developers go into a manic "let me try this" mode of debugging, and have had to stop myself from doing the same often enough. So he does have a point.
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
A vulnerability codenamed Devil's Ivy is putting thousands of Internet-connected devices at risk of hacking. Stop me if you've heard this one before...
Oh, SOAP? Yeah, never trust that protocol, or anyone that promotes it.
I miss those days.
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of intelligent devices can be linked using the network. I'm sure the hackers can barely wait
|
|
|
|
|
and with the recently posted article showing the hole. I can tell you, very few embedded guys think about buffer overflow attacks.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
People can detect a fake image of a real-world scene only 60 percent of the time, and even then can only tell what is wrong with the image 45 percent of the time, according to new research. That PhotoShop box image? Totally fake.
|
|
|
|
|
The story of the agency is well-known, which is that the space program may suffer irreversible consequences if any of its software is incorrect, among them death. The shock of that reality has allowed them to develop a certain attitude towards programming. It could be instructive to take a look at what they value. Because they *are* rocket scientists
Yeah, one "naughty" word in the article. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me. I know it's probably the first time you've encountered that word at work.
|
|
|
|