|
There has to be one. I'm sure he just missed that in his description. :fingerscrossed:
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
The async and await keywords make asynchronous programming almost too easy. Go ahead and read it. I'll await your return.
|
|
|
|
|
SMB1 is considered outdated and not secure. However, some users with very old equipment may be in for a surprise if their Windows 11 laptops can't connect to an old networked hard drive, as officials said in a blog post about the SMB1 phase out plan. Bad news if you're old, outdated, or just insecure
|
|
|
|
|
At Baugh’s direction, the couple received anonymous deliveries including a preserved fetal pig, a bloody pig mask, a funeral wreath and a book on surviving the loss of a spouse.
I ordered a pound of cure off Ebay. But the box they sent me only contained an ounce of prevention.
|
|
|
|
|
No horse's head?!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
No, but he was the other end of the horse.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
In 2021, we ran the Go Developer Survey from Oct 26th to Nov 16th and had 11,840 responses—the largest turnout so far in the 6 years we’ve been running the survey! Go-go-gadget survey!
|
|
|
|
|
To boldly Go where no developer has gone before!
|
|
|
|
|
Security researchers are warning that LinkedIn has become the most spoofed brand in phishing attacks, accounting for more than 52% of all such incidents at a global level. They actually send non-phishing emails?
|
|
|
|
|
That's the good thing on not having an account... I don't even receive them... and if, they directly go to the trash bin (without crossing the drawing board and without receiving the 20 bucks)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
From the story below, if they scrape the data from the LinkedIn screen, not illegal to display. The underlying fake links would be.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers at Monash University and CSIRO's Data61 in Australia have recently developed a machine learning-based approach that could help users to identify phishing emails, so that they don't inadvertently install malware or send sensitive data to cyber-criminals. Click here to install it now!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: A model that can help inexperienced users identify phishing emails One more thing to be ignored.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today I learned (TIL) there’s an 83-page FBI “guide” to internet slang filled with abbreviations entered either by a complete troll or someone totally clueless WTE, FYI FWIW
Sadly, WTE hasn't actually made it as far as the FBI. Yet.
|
|
|
|
|
But the NSA has it referenced though.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals may have set an important precedent in the tech world. The court has essentially concluded that “Data Scraping” is not hacking. Breaking news: Sanity prevails.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Breaking news: Sanity prevails. Are you sure? Looking at what politicians are doing or trying to do in many countries regarding Net and Data...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd rather cheer for one tiny sane step and ignore all the negative
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I like your optimism...
Be careful, some people could confuse it with naivety
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise, couldn't just looking at a web page be considered data scraping? My eyes took information off the screen and into my brain. If you display it in public, I'm thinking it's fair game.
Unless of course, you copyright every single web page.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
- I think that the issue is one of quantity. There is no way that your Mk. 1 brain + eyeballs can reliably "scrape" a significant amount of data from a site like LinkedIn. At least, not enough for you to open a competing service.
- If you look at the tiny print at the bottom of many Internet pages, you will find a copyright.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
#1 would preclude the use of technology to add value to any legal activity.
#2 would be a way to prevent it, but the question is whether the contents can be protected by copyright, which usually covers an original work. I doubt that a LinkedIn profile, for example, qualifies.
Probably the easiest way to do this is to only display the data to logged in accounts. And when opening an account, to have the user agreement include a prohibition on scraping.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: Probably the easiest way to do this is to only display the data to logged in accounts.
As I understand it, part of the problem is that LinkedIn wanted to have their cake and eat it - both be indexable by Google, and disallow "scraping". Google will not index data behind paywalls, password protection, etc.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Sanity prevails.
And on the Left Coast, too!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|