|
IF it really is that good... I suppose they will get bought, put in a drawer and forgotten for a while.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
By one of the two above.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
another scam in the making... get investors money bleed it on sex drugs and girls... and buy a bmw and a privatejet later show some crap phone to them saying this is the privacy-first OS
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
abmv wrote: get investors money bleed it on sex drugs and girls... and buy a bmw and a privatejet later show some crap phone to them saying this is the privacy-first OS
Sounds awesome, where do I sign up?
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
If the OS really does put privacy first, then that means that advertisers will be put last. Therefore the OS will be unsuccessful.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Not necessarily. If licenses are cheap enough, and customization of the O/S to specific hardware is easy enough, the cost could be absorbed as part of production.
The phone OEMs get nothing from advertisers. All that revenue goes to the social media and search engine giants, with a trickle to website owners. The main drivers of Android use by OEMs are (a) that it's free, and (b) that it's based on Linux, so getting developers to customize it is relatively easy.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
The Altair 8800 arguably launched Microsoft. Now [Dave Glover] from Microsoft offers an emulated and potentially cloud-based Altair emulation with CP/M and Microsoft Basic. For all your switch-flipping, and LED-watching delights
|
|
|
|
|
It's all fun and games until it's Altair that goes to Microsoft.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Developers are still gunning for higher salaries and better conditions despite recent tech layoffs and fears of recession. "Well, come on and let me know, should I stay or should I go?"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Developers are still gunning for higher salaries and better conditions Is not what every worker in the world tries sooner or later?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's exactly because we feel secure: we are needed, we are few, companies are in constant search. HR still treats us like disposable blue collars so we move and move and move.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting how the media focuses on the big tech companies and assumes that those of us who work elsewhere fall into the same category with regards to job security.
|
|
|
|
|
Intel’s Thermal Velocity Boost lets the chip run fast, so long as you can keep it cool. *Liquid nitrogen sold separately
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: *Liquid nitrogen sold separately FTFY
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn’t that what I wrote? I don’t see a typo or anything.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid nitrogen (always bold), has been a joker card to answer dumb questions in CP since I am member. I can give you that it now is not used as much as before, but I didn't thought it was that fogotten
I just tried to add the double meaning of your comment as an answer to the article.
Sadly, joke went unsuccessfull
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Cool ! I could skip the liquid nitrogen, and replace my space heater ?
And, the new KS beast's (possible it's a specially binned K version ?) TDP is 150 + ? [^] "The CPU is shown with Max TDP of 150W; however, this is just the Processor Base Power (PL1) settings, and it almost certainly higher with Max Turbo Power (MTP/PL2) which is not confirmed yet."
I can't figure why I feel compelled to examine the specs of the "ooh shiny" new CPU's and GPU's, notebooks/laptops, monitors, etc. And, the issue of higher clock vs. more cores ... why do I bother ? Maybe I need a 12-step recovery program ?
Thanks for another "fix," Kent !
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: I can't figure why I feel compelled to examine the specs of the "ooh shiny" new CPU's and GPU's, notebooks/laptops, monitors, etc.
Some people buy car magazines, others buy "beautiful homes" magazines, still others buy "guns and ammo" magazines. Doesn't necessarily mean that they are going to buy any of these items.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
if generalities produced wisdom, i would be enlightened
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
And some others buy the things without buying the magazines... (specially guns and ammo)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Many have viewed the last 10 years of tech as having been increasingly employee-advantaged. By pointing out that England swings like the pendulum do?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Many have viewed the last 10 years of tech as having been increasingly bad employee-advantaged. FTFH
The biggest problem is that good employees are going to be unfairly included in some of those actions.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
About three-quarters of Java and .NET applications have vulnerabilities from the OWASP Top 10 list, while only 55% of JavaScript codebases have such flaws, according to testing data. It's extra embarrassing when JavaScript apps are found to be more secure
Yes, another interpretation of the VeraCode study from last week, but we felt it was different enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: It's extra embarrassing when JavaScript apps are found to be more secure Security through obscurity?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In networking operations, .NET 7 improves the capabilities and performance of the existing HTTP and WebSockets protocols. It exposed a new protocol called QUIC and has many performance improvements compared to .NET 6. But still no Gopher
|
|
|
|