|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I can't see anything going wrong with this feature You need glasses. Really, you need glasses...
I only hope that the car manufacturesrs are not so dumb to get into the hype and don't produce standard keys anymore...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In many situations, there is only one possible type allowed in a given place. And yet C# still requires you to explicitly list the type. It's the new new
Assuming it ever makes it past the proposal stage
|
|
|
|
|
First came:
Dictionary<string, List<int>> field = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>();
Then came:
var field = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>();
Now they're proposing:
Dictionary<string, List<int>> field = new();
Heck, why not go for gold:
var field = new();
and figure it out from the future usage.
|
|
|
|
|
You're getting quite close to Javascript there!
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't new() implied if later used? Just use var field; !
|
|
|
|
|
Burn the heretic!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If I could choose. I would keep with:Marc Clifton wrote: Then came:
var field = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>(); If the compiler doesn't care between #2 and #3, I find #2 easier to read
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Cloud security: Microsoft details how sophisticated attacks can move quickly from a small breach to a big problem. Maybe if you didn't just watch them, they wouldn't have taken over?
|
|
|
|
|
Oracle laughs at such pretention
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmarks suggest programming language Julia may be the best choice for big-data analysis using CSV format files. "Half of what I say is meaningless, but I say it just to reach you, Julia"
I'm not sure those are the two languages you want to be picking a speed fight with...
|
|
|
|
|
(ArseTechnica) We bought walmart's $140 laptop so you wouldn't have to/[^]
I wonder what he actually expected for $140... a rubberrrrrrrrr biscuit?!
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It seems quite clear that he didn't expect much at all ... and didn't even get that.
|
|
|
|
|
The way he was talking, he expected quite a bit more than he got. I wonder if he'd installed a lighter version of Linux, what kind of performance he'd see on it. Of course, it's really a non-starter anyway because an 11-inch screen would be REALLY hard to look at for any length of time...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are my thoughts, based on my own experience, on what monitors work best for programming. "Because you're worth it"
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty nice blog... I had never thought of some of those aspects.
Interesting read. Thanks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that I have fully functional keyboards at home and in the office; I am looking at monitors for the home... probably going with 27-31 inch range and probably going with 1440.
A good thing to now that a line of code can be 100 characters wide
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
A team of researchers claim to have achieved quantum teleportation using individual electrons. Beam me up, lepton
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Beam me up, lepton Have you fired Scotty? How could you...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe not..
Maybe it's just Scotty using quantum Leptons ray?!
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: Maybe it's just Scotty using quantum Leptons ray?! As long as he is not dead like the cat...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe both?!
|
|
|
|
|
Our Developer Ecosystem Survey, which JetBrains runs yearly, aims to reveal the current ambience of the developer world. Today we are happy to share with you the results of the 2020 edition of this survey, focusing on C#. For those that see sharp(ly)
Yeah, I posted the full survey last week, but I figured some might be interested in the drilldown.
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, a good deal of IT time is spent firefighting, survey shows. DevOps to the rescue? So if we don't put in any bugs, we get a three day weekend?
|
|
|
|