|
The original ethernet was running on thicket, 3 Mbps (unless you insist on rounding down 2.94 to 2), but never commercialized. The first commercially successful ethernet were using thicknet on 10 Mbps (10BASE5). Thinnet, 10BASE2 came several years later.
|
|
|
|
|
What are all those tokens?
|
|
|
|
|
See, I’m not the only one who goes there.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
|
obermd wrote: It appears dilbert.com is gone Yeah... the author has been crucifixed for racism
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I wish some hardware expert (I am a software guy) would set up a table listing ethernet versions across and ethernet characteristics downwards, like cable technology, speed, signal encoding, plug type(s), network technology, physical medium access control, power delivery support, link frame details, ... indicating when support for it appeared and ended.
I guess one line in the table should be 'Marketing name', i.e. 'Ethernet'. That would give us at least one property to relate the thicknet ethernet of my student days to today's ethernet. I cannot really think of any other.
|
|
|
|
|
Seek, and ye shall find: Table of Ethernet Standards
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
.NET 8 Preview 2 offers a short, but exciting array of theme updates, new features, and improvements. Not a big difference, but it's new!
|
|
|
|
|
Google launched MakerSuite, a new browser-based tool that will make it easier for developers to build AI-powered applications on top of Google’s foundation models. If everyone else builds an AI, would you do it too?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't want to repeat me, see two messages below and change Meta for Alphabet[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
IT departments may need to continually intervene to clean up messes, while business users may become hopelessly entangled in managing their software. They go low, we get high
|
|
|
|
|
I know it is a Leslie, but... kind of mandatory[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who uses the word "coder" to refer to a programmer or "coding" for programming has never understood what programming is in reality.
Programming is the art and science of finding a workable, specific solution to a class of problems using the tools available for the computing environment the program will run on.
Code is the end result, but the programming is the entire process that goes before even the first line of code is produced.
Low code and no code tackle the last, minimal part of the process. If a person cannot abstract a procedure to an algorithm and make a flow-chart out of it there are no amount of no-code or low-code platforms that will do it for them.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Code is the end result, but the programming is the entire process that goes before even the first line of code is produced. I thought that was architecture or engineering, not programming itself.
den2k88 wrote: If a person cannot abstract a procedure to an algorithm and make a flow-chart out of it there are no amount of no-code or low-code platforms that will do it for them. And even when a person can do it, no- or low-code platforms will probably still not be able to do it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: And even when a person can do it, no- or low-code platforms will probably still not be able to do it.
If you can write a flow-chart, Stateflow will make a program out of it. With some study and the right options it will be quite optimized too.
Some low code / no code platforms are powerful. Costly and with a predatory policy that makes casinos and Microsoft look like the International Red Cross, but...
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: policy that makes casinos and Microsoft look like the International Red Cross
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to Meta LLaMA, AI text models may have their "Stable Diffusion moment." Let a thousand AIs blossom
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: You can now run a GPT-3-level AI model on your laptop, phone, and Raspberry Pi And (being a Meta Product) transform them to data slurping devices on the same time...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We’ve created GPT-4, the latest milestone in OpenAI’s effort in scaling up deep learning. "Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate"
86% on the Certified Sommelier exam? Keep it away from the wines already!
|
|
|
|
|
Name makes me think of Grand Theft Auto 4. Not that that is any better than Skynet.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever a company suffers a data breach, passwords are one of the most commonly leaked pieces of information. And when threat actors behind the attack get a hold of these, they are normally dumped on the dark web where they can be purchased and used for identity and financial theft. Or the same 7 passwords 103 million times
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Or the same 7 passwords 103 million times
This^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
As the company accelerates its push into AI products, the ethics and society team is gone Where we're going, we don't need ethics
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: As the company accelerates its push into AI products, the ethics and society team is gone Looking at how MS has evolved the last years... either that department was full of damned lazy / dumb people or they were being ignored in such a way, as they were not there anyways.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: the ethics and society team is gone Somehow that team doesn't look particularly helpful, productive or useful. AI is a technology (but mostly a buzzword), it's developed by engineers. Ethics is a prerogative of the surrounding society and it is expressed by means of laws, regulations, common beliefs and accepted behaviors. An ethic and society team in a technical environment sounds like a way to hire the significant other / nephew / cousin of some director.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|