|
|
|
|
It's also got lots of site-driving links to his blog.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nikita S - Professional Profile[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
If it's spam in the moderation queue, don't let it through!
How to create pdf template designer editor[^]
The spam detector is heuristic, so when you tell it "this is spam" it remembers and uses that next time it sees something similar. If you tell it "this isn't spam" it remembers that as well - so it makes it more likely to let similar spam through next time.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't. Strange 
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
That happened to me the other day - I was listed as the editor for a question when I wasn't even on t'interwebs. Site bug I assume...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The answer is gone so that I don't know what to do.
Was it spam, abusive, or trolling?
|
|
|
|
|
Reopening an old question (particularly a seven year old one with 9 solutions) is normally counted as rep-point farming, which is abusive behaviour, isn't it?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. But it was the first post of a new user who just joined.
In such cases I disbelieve that his intention was rep-point farming until he posts more answers to old questions.
From my point of view writing a comment and optionally reporting the answer is sufficient instead of reporting the user here which leads to the account being closed.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I'm going soft in my dotage  but for new users, I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt unless it's actually spam or abuse.
Report the answer; leave a comment explaining what's wrong; but don't report the user unless they keep doing it after being warned.
(Of course, if it's the only answer, or adds some spectacular new insight to the thread, then there's no need to report it.)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: which is abusive behaviour, isn't it?
Why? If points do not matter why care if someone is trying to get more? Especially if the answer is valid.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
To a seven year old question with nine answers already? You have to ask yourself "why is he posting this?"
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: You have to ask yourself "why is he posting this?"
To gain up some points and contribute to the site. Again, who cares?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
