|
I think it's possible to add co-authors without they have to confirm. However, looking at that, I believe it would be a good idea to require confirmation from the co-author before they're added.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted a comment stating my doubts about Chris being involved in this.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember this: [^]
An author can add co-authors by knowing the member id...But IIRC, the co-author notified of it...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I do remember
I posted this since IMO this feels like abuse...
|
|
|
|
|
I agree.
I reported both authors, to be on the safe side...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I reported both authors
Didn't feel that was necessary. I reported just the first one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think he tripped on the wire and went straight out of CP. Pity...
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I think he might have received a more sympathetic hearing if he had actually taken note of OriginalGriff's comments, and pulled his articles for reworking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damn. We need some better way of avoiding such things. And I had already looked at your message, and voted him down, before I got to the Q&A messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I actually think that he always links to his own post, so I'd say: spammer.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Let kick him off...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
The spam answers and the member are gone.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|