|
Did the disapproves just come in quickly or do you have the possibility to delete articles in moderation as protector?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I deleted it. But I can't delete users.
|
|
|
|
|
Spam[^]mer[^]
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are all gone :headshot: x 6
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I saw that.
I'm new to this, didn't know we could kill members in one shot, where do you do that?
|
|
|
|
|
In the message moderation queue. When you hit that red X on a message, the spammer is gone. It does make me nervous when the filter on rare occasions becomes self aware and throws all of us in there .
As far as I can tell, smacking a post in the QA moderation queue does not result in a headshot in the same way as posts on the message moderation queue, but I could be wrong.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Ah! That gives a new meaning to the message I got from Sean: "If you see a spam message, make sure to mark it as spam before you delete it."
|
|
|
|
|
SoMad wrote: post in the QA moderation queue does not result in a headshot in the same way as posts on the message moderation queue, but I could be wrong
No. You were absolutely right.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Spam[^] mer[^]
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
|