|
Can you say what the nature of what you're doing in the loop is?
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I haven't written those modules, I have only been asked to refactor those, but what I can see, it's similar to a heavy pipelined processing where processing order is important. I don't see anything fancy here at all, but yet to debug it thoroughly, so can't say much. 
Whether I think I can, or think I can't, I am always bloody right!
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough. Normally when I do this sort of stuff I just call the 'business' part of the operation in a thundering great loop (1000x, 1000000x operations etc.) and time it with Diagnostics.Stopwatch. You can just then tinker away and try different things out and see the difference it makes.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, thank you! 
Whether I think I can, or think I can't, I am always bloody right!
|
|
|
|
|
One question that I would look to answer - are there any items that could be offloaded to the GPU. I've had a lot of success offloading mathematically complex ideas here in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope there is any scope for that, currently debugging the code to understand what exactly it does. I am not the one who has written those modules, have no idea whatsoever about the project and still they are forcing me to refactor and optimize. .
Thanks for you suggestion.
Whether I think I can, or think I can't, I am always bloody right!
|
|
|
|
|
Before you do ANY refactoring, make sure that the code is covered with meaningful unit tests. It will make your refactoring a lot easier if you can test each change against a repeatable, meaningful set of control values.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, thank you.
Whether I think I can, or think I can't, I am always bloody right!
|
|
|
|
|
Step one is to examine the algorithm itself and consider completely rewriting it. If performance is absolute, consider creating a native DLL. It does without saying to examine the use of the heap in all of this.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello from Mexico, an apology for my English is not very good.
I have a x628c team was doing some testing and delete my punches with my personal ClearGLog function and then when I wanted to retrieve the information recueperaba but with all my personal ID to 0.
I would ask if there is any other way to remove labels x628c team and if there is way to remove the labels depending on some date.
Beforehand thank you very much for reading this.
I am using the dll zkemkeeper and programming in c #
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but that means absolutely nothing to me.
Perhaps if you give us an example, it might help a little?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
What's a "x628c"??
You're saying all of this assuming everyone knows what you're talking about and what you're doing. If you don't describe everything we have no context to give any advise with.
You really need to read the links in my signature.
|
|
|
|
|
when we are using winform to index data through lucene.net then think say 10 same win apps is running in a office and they all index data. if the index segment file is created in every pc then it will be problem or we can create in any centralize pc but problem occur when that pc suddenly being unavailable from network. so i like to know can we store lucene.net index in sql server for centralize access. if possible please guide me. i search lot for storing lucene.net index in sql server but found none. i got a article on java and they i saw it is possible. here is the link http://kalanir.blogspot.in/2008/06/creating-search-index-in-database.html
they said Lucence contains the JdbcDirectory interface for this purpose but i am working with lucene.net & c# so please anyone guide me how make it possible to store lucene index in sql server.
thanks
tbhattacharjee
|
|
|
|
|
Tridip Bhattacharjee wrote: can create in any centralize pc but problem occur when that pc suddenly being unavailable from network.
..you have the same problem with SQL Server. Simply install it on a centralized problem, and make sure it doesn't become unavailable - just as your SQL Server.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
hello
C# sql server column count read & sql server code
|
|
|
|
|
And what exactly is your question?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please explain it more clearly?
|
|
|
|
|
What is your question?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
To get the count of how many columns are in a particular table in Sql Server, you could use something like:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sys.columns WHERE object_id=OBJECT_ID('tablename')
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
You seriously need to click the links in my signature and read them.
|
|
|
|
|
i got a code which talk about locking trick at the time of indexing data with Lucene.net
private static FSDirectory _directoryTemp;
private static FSDirectory _directory
{
get
{
if (_directoryTemp == null) _directoryTemp = FSDirectory.Open(new DirectoryInfo(_luceneDir));
if (IndexWriter.IsLocked(_directoryTemp)) IndexWriter.Unlock(_directoryTemp);
var lockFilePath = Path.Combine(_luceneDir, "write.lock");
if (File.Exists(lockFilePath)) File.Delete(lockFilePath);
return _directoryTemp;
}
}
but the code looks not very good. can anyone tell me why the above code is checking directory is locked or not....when directory gets locked?
see this line of code if (IndexWriter.IsLocked(_directoryTemp)) IndexWriter.Unlock(_directoryTemp); if directory is locked then it unlock it but what will happen if any index writer is indexing data and directory gets unlock then what will happen? looking for best practice. thanks
tbhattacharjee
|
|
|
|
|
You're much more likely to get help around Lucene.Net here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
i apollogized that here i am asking about Lucene.net in c# forum. i need some basic guidance about Lucene.net index technique before working with it.
below way people store or index their data by lucene.
var doc = new Document();
doc.Add(new Field("ID", oData.ID.ToString() , Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED));
doc.Add(new Field("Title", oData.Title, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED));
doc.Add(new Field("Description", oData.Description, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED));
doc.Add(new Field("Url", oData.Url, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED));
writer.AddDocument(doc);
i like to know what is the meaning of Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED & Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED
if we say Field.Store.NO then what will happen and when people should writeField.Store.NO. please give a example that when we should not store? if anything is not store in lucene index file then we can pull that data or can not search data by that field.
what is the meaning of Field.Index.ANALYZED and Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED ? what happen when we say ANALYZED or not ANALYZED ? explain with example what actually lucene does when it encounters ANALYZED or not ANALYZED and Field.Store.NO & Field.Store.YES ?
tbhattacharjee
|
|
|
|
|
Tridip Bhattacharjee wrote: i apollogized that here i am asking about Lucene.net in c# forum
If only there was some documentation[^] written about this already.
|
|
|
|
|
Could someone explain to me each line of the following code of what the code does as well as the overall functionality created:
string attempt;
attempt = My_Dialogs.InputBox("Enter your password"); while (attempt != "basic")
{
MessageBox.Show("Wrong! - try again.");
attempt = InputBox("Enter your password"); }
MessageBox.Show("Welcome to the program!");
Thanks
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
