C#

Re: Specified cast is not valid: assigning float values 0.00 vs 0.00f

1-Dec-13 20:33

Try Convert.ToSingle() instead of a direct cast.
e.g. Convert.ToSingle(ds1.Tables[0].Rows[1].ItemArray[2])

Apps - Color Analyzer | Arctic | XKCD | Sound Meter | Speed Dial

Peter Leow1-Dec-13 20:44

Peter Leow

1-Dec-13 20:44

Try this:
fValue=float.Parse(ds1.Tables[0].Rows[1].ItemArray[2])

What is use of nested transaction in sql server

Girijesh Kr. Prajapati1-Dec-13 20:15

Girijesh Kr. Prajapati

1-Dec-13 20:15

As we know that when inner transaction will commit and outer transaction is going to rollback then outer transaction also roll back to the inner transaction means there is no own scope of inner transaction then what is use of this.
Please explain me

Thanks,
Girijesh Kumar

Re: What is use of nested transaction in sql server

Abhinav S1-Dec-13 20:34

Re: What is use of nested transaction in sql server

1-Dec-13 20:34

This[^] explains the use nested transactions for you.

Apps - Color Analyzer | Arctic | XKCD | Sound Meter | Speed Dial

OriginalGriff1-Dec-13 20:36

How can we identify that the Page is Post Back?

1-Dec-13 20:36

Don't think of it that way.
Turn it round, and you can roll back the inner transaction, and commit the outer one.

IFTIKHAR AHMADQ1-Dec-13 5:16

IFTIKHAR AHMADQ

1-Dec-13 5:16

Hy Tell me anyone how can we indentify that the page is postBack?

Re: How can we identify that the Page is Post Back?

OriginalGriff1-Dec-13 5:43

Re: How can we identify that the Page is Post Back?

1-Dec-13 5:43

Simple:
In the page Load event:

private void Page_Load()
    {
    if (!IsPostback)
        {
        // Do non-postback things...
        }

DRAYKKO7771-Dec-13 9:02

DRAYKKO777

1-Dec-13 9:02

There is a good article on this on the MSDN site:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.ui.page.ispostback(v=vs.110).aspx[^]

Check it out. Smile | :)

Re: How can we identify that the Page is Post Back?

Abhinav S1-Dec-13 20:36

Re: Xml and .NET Remoting

1-Dec-13 20:36

Yes. We can identify if a page is a postback.

Apps - Color Analyzer | Arctic | XKCD | Sound Meter | Speed Dial

Xml and .NET Remoting

DaemonDarkthorn30-Nov-13 1:30

DaemonDarkthorn

30-Nov-13 1:30

Can anyone please help me with some examples or anything useful?
Problem:

I have to create Server and client console applications in C# with Xml and .NET Remoting communication. I can get My remotable object and server side to work, however my client side won't.

The objective is to pull data from an Xml file and display it in the client console, after the client has made one of two choices.
Server activated object, singleton activation mode

SledgeHammer0130-Nov-13 9:35

SledgeHammer01

30-Nov-13 9:35

.NET Remoting is a deprecated technology. Use WCF instead.

vs2010 Setup and deployment with database

Member 848098029-Nov-13 21:45

Member 8480980

29-Nov-13 21:45

i have finished my project,now i wan to implement into my client place,my backend is sqlser2008,when installing sqlserver2008 its taking so long time to install,how to deploy the database with my application itself ,i have tried the local DB (srvice-oriented database.sdf)but its not working,i knoe i am missing some steps can you guide me for this one.,

OriginalGriff30-Nov-13 0:41

30-Nov-13 0:41

If you need SQL server, then you have to install it - regardless of how long that takes: and it can be a while as it is a complex program, and needs some good google skills just to install...

The other option is (as you say) to use a local database, and SQLCE (.sdf files) is one option (there is also SqLite or even :ack!spit: Access which are fine for single user apps).

So what "isn't working" about the .SDF file solution? What is it doing that you didn't expect, or not doing that you did?

Mycroft Holmes30-Nov-13 0:47

Mycroft Holmes

30-Nov-13 0:47

OriginalGriff wrote:
even :ack!spit: Access which

Could almost be reported as abuse!

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH

OriginalGriff30-Nov-13 0:54

30-Nov-13 0:54

There are those who swear by it.

There are those that swear at it.

There are those that start off doing the first, and end up doing the second. Laugh | :laugh:

And there are those poor, deluded fools who think it can be used in multiuser... Dead | X|

Mycroft Holmes30-Nov-13 12:33

Mycroft Holmes

30-Nov-13 12:33

OriginalGriff wrote:
And there are those poor, deluded fools who think it can be used in multiuser

That was me... in the early 90s

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH

OriginalGriff30-Nov-13 21:04

30-Nov-13 21:04

Me too, same period. Blush | :O

That was when I started swearing at it, rather than by it.

Abhinav S30-Nov-13 3:26