|
|
|
Rajdeep.NET wrote: You should have googled for this, before posting it here.
My failometer is detecting vast quantities of FAIL!
"Its SQL - hardly programming..." (Caslen)
|
|
|
|
|
I was just this minute wondering where Rajdeep.NETs' Stupid Question Of The Day was, and lo! You write it! Thanks.
(Now, go and get a book on C#, a book on .NET and a book on programming generally. Lock yourself in your room, and don't come out until you have read them.)
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.
This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Lock yourself in your room, and don't come out until you have read them.
There - fixed that for you.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I was just this minute wondering where Rajdeep.NETs' Stupid Question Of The Day was, and lo! You write it! Thanks
Why do you think so Griff??!! If you think that what I asked was really that stupid to be termed as the day's most stupid question, then just post the code here and I would appreciate you as a genius. Otherwise, just commenting on my posts, makes you the same as I am.
So???.....
Rajdeep.NET 
|
|
|
|
|
Rajdeep.NET wrote: I would appreciate you as a genius.
Who cares...
We don't get paid to write the code for you so you can copy'n'paste it into your own code and take credit for it. Besides, it's the same code you've been seeing in all the Console app examples. This tells us that you obviously don't understand the concepts behind writing to a file, nor do you understand what the code your looking at does. This makes it virtually impossible for you to support the code and expand on it in your own software.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: We don't get paid to write the code for you so you can copy'n'paste it into your own code and take credit for it
Alright Mr. Dave Kreskowiak, as you wish. You also have a point. Finally, I discovered that I am the most idiot //programmer (calling myself a programmer will be wrong) codeproject ever had in its forums. I'll make sure I learn the basics first. Thanks for all your advice.
Rajdeep.NET (starving to be a developer) 
|
|
|
|
|
Rajdeep.NET wrote: I discovered that I am the most idiot //programmer (calling myself a programmer will be wrong) codeproject ever had in its forums.
Not even close. There have people around here who couldn't find the power switch to turn the machine on!
There are a certain set of minimum skills you need to be a developer/programmer/whatever. You need the ability to do research and the ability to try things out (explore). These two things are the basis of the scientific method, or learning what you don't know in a structured manner. Without this, you don't have a prayer of becomming a decent programmer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you think I said it was "the day's most stupid question" then you also need to learn to read. For a "programmer" who intends to sell his code (cf. your previous R.NsSQOTD posts) you ask the basic questions that even a 1st year CS student learns in the first week of a C# course.
I do not want, desire, or need you to appreciate me, as a genius or otherwise. I do however reserve the right to reply in any manner I see fit (within the constraints of the forum) to someone who is:
1) Trying to pass himself off as something he clearly isn't.
2) Trying to get others to do his work for him, without payment.
3) Trying to use our intectual properties for his commercial gain.
4) Wasting the time of unpaid professionals who are helping others out of the goodness of their hearts.
5) Incapable of refining a Google search (many of my initial searches give thousands, or millions of results)
6) Being rude to others, for doing exactly what he is doing, and thus hypocritical.
and last but not least
7) Being a complete f****** d*******, with niether b**** or a c*** (except on his f*******).
Now, do you fit in any of those categories? No - you fit in them all.
[edit]
P.s. Before you ask, I have nothing against ignorance, it can be cured by education. Stupidity on the other hand...
[/edit]
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.
This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
|
|
|
|
|
Step away from the keyboard sir.
[That is class 1 diatribe, well done. Have an OBE]
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's to early in the morning to be sarcastic, it's especially to early to read your stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajdeep.NET wrote: What code should I implement in the Button_Click event handler in order to do so?
MessageBox.Show("Bye. See You");
Application.Exit();
That would be the best code you can write and the most best help that you can offer your users without tormenting them through the numerous coding horrors that I could speculate from you.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
code for Autogerate number in a datagrid field
|
|
|
|
|
You should see someone about that stutter.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
And I was just wondering what the question was. Thanks for clarifying!
Henry Minute wrote: stutter
Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well.
|
|
|
|
|
I used it successfully for grid.fronend-c# , Backend-sql2005.
Using following code u can auto generate no. from database.
1.open command.
2.use data reader.
and write this code
while(dr.read())
{
int c1=c1+1;
}
c1=c1+1;
dgv.rows[no.].cells[0].value=c1.tostring(); //dgv=datagrid view name
|
|
|
|
|
There are so many things wrong with this code it's silly. Thankfully, I will never have to follow you and support/cleanup your code.
Your simple little algorithm does work, though VERY inefficiently, and only when there is but a single user of your database.
When you expand this so more than one user is creating a new record at the same time, your code breaks, so severely, it corrupts the database, puts an enormous load on the SQL server and network carrying the data, and will get slower and slower as the number of records in the table climbs.
Ask youself this. What if a second client ran this same code at nearly the same time? Both clients would get the same last record ID, and both add 1 to it, and both create a new record with the same new ID, but different data. Congratulations! You just corrupted your database to the point where you can't easily recover, if at all!
Your application should never generate it's own sequential record ID's. This should be left up to the database itself, when concurrancy issues like this can be controlled.
|
|
|
|
|
How to add autogenerate number in datagrid
|
|
|
|
|
You can't. The database generates it so you can only display it.
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You need to clarify your question, in order to make us understand the problem clearly. Make your query descriptive dude Check out the links given below:
ClickHere
www.daniweb.com/forums/thread105333.html[^]
P.S. You should have googled for this, before posting it here.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajdeep.NET wrote: P.S. You should have googled for this, before posting it here.
Thats rich, coming from someone who asks how write to a file 5 minutes later
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So you do know how to use Google then? And here I was thinking that you didn't know how to google.
Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
