Click here to Skip to main content
15,916,463 members
Home / Discussions / C#
   

C#

 
AnswerRe: How can a struct with no explicit constructor have uninitialized fields? Pin
PIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 14:47
mvePIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 14:47 
GeneralRe: How can a struct with no explicit constructor have uninitialized fields? Pin
JoeRip5-Nov-07 14:51
JoeRip5-Nov-07 14:51 
GeneralRe: How can a struct with no explicit constructor have uninitialized fields? Pin
PIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 16:19
mvePIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 16:19 
QuestionUpdating Primary Key Pin
serene joey5-Nov-07 14:26
serene joey5-Nov-07 14:26 
AnswerRe: Updating Primary Key Pin
PIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 16:23
mvePIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 16:23 
QuestionRe: Updating Primary Key Pin
serene joey5-Nov-07 18:41
serene joey5-Nov-07 18:41 
AnswerRe: Updating Primary Key Pin
Andrei Ungureanu5-Nov-07 20:03
Andrei Ungureanu5-Nov-07 20:03 
GeneralRe: Updating Primary Key Pin
serene joey5-Nov-07 20:44
serene joey5-Nov-07 20:44 
GeneralRe: Updating Primary Key Pin
PIEBALDconsult6-Nov-07 4:05
mvePIEBALDconsult6-Nov-07 4:05 
GeneralRe: Updating Primary Key Pin
serene joey11-Nov-07 20:10
serene joey11-Nov-07 20:10 
QuestionHooking Direct Api Pin
danzar5-Nov-07 13:16
danzar5-Nov-07 13:16 
QuestionMaking Project Pin
Sameh96140335-Nov-07 11:30
Sameh96140335-Nov-07 11:30 
AnswerRe: Making Project Pin
Paul Conrad5-Nov-07 15:25
professionalPaul Conrad5-Nov-07 15:25 
QuestionData not stored on pocket pc Pin
karanjsingh5-Nov-07 11:19
karanjsingh5-Nov-07 11:19 
QuestionThreadsafe "for" without lock() Pin
szolDat5-Nov-07 11:05
szolDat5-Nov-07 11:05 
AnswerRe: Threadsafe "for" without lock() Pin
Guffa5-Nov-07 12:07
Guffa5-Nov-07 12:07 
AnswerRe: Threadsafe "for" without lock() Pin
szolDat5-Nov-07 12:31
szolDat5-Nov-07 12:31 
"You have "solved" a problem that doesn't exist"

Please explain why the following situation isn't possible (I'm somewhat clear about the heap and the stack):
Thread1 enters the cycle, increments i by 1.
The control is passed to Thread2 and it enters the cycle too, incrementing i by 1. i now equals 2.
Thread1 gets control again and tries to access an array's element (or perform any action) using the cycle variable. There you have it, a race condition where the value of i depends on the order of the threads' access to the cycle.

Another thing is, every calculation will give bad results which depends on the number of executions and there are variables involved which are mutually modifiable by the threads. In this situation you have to use a lock, or you can use the method I proposed.

Thank you for your attention.
GeneralRe: Threadsafe "for" without lock() Pin
PIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 16:02
mvePIEBALDconsult5-Nov-07 16:02 
AnswerRe: Threadsafe "for" without lock() Pin
Guffa5-Nov-07 20:24
Guffa5-Nov-07 20:24 
GeneralRe: Threadsafe "for" without lock() Pin
szolDat6-Nov-07 21:38
szolDat6-Nov-07 21:38 
AnswerRe: Threadsafe "for" without lock() Pin
Guffa6-Nov-07 22:20
Guffa6-Nov-07 22:20 
Questionunknown problem is visual studio Pin
netJP12L5-Nov-07 10:38
netJP12L5-Nov-07 10:38 
AnswerRe: unknown problem is visual studio Pin
Colin Angus Mackay5-Nov-07 11:00
Colin Angus Mackay5-Nov-07 11:00 
GeneralRe: unknown problem is visual studio Pin
netJP12L6-Nov-07 3:56
netJP12L6-Nov-07 3:56 
GeneralRe: EventArgs Pin
half-life5-Nov-07 10:34
half-life5-Nov-07 10:34 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.