|
Would you please care to tell us wtf this has to do with C#?
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
mav
--
Black holes are the places where God divided by 0...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Watch what happens when you type "How to write a research proposal"[^] into Google...
[sarcasm] How frickin' amazing [/sarcasm]
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: How frickin' amazing
I was rather impressed by the results too! Who knew Google understood English?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I saw something like some 2.8 million results.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Who knew Google understood English?
That is amazing
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
To the original poster: that was 3,310,000 hits and you'd rather still ask in CP?
I am a SysAdmin, I battle my own daemons.
|
|
|
|
|
Always start with "It was a dark and stormy night."
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
|
|
|
|
|
And end it with "lived happily ever after"
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
This is almost as bad as the defect reports that I get... "The text on the button is wrong" Drives me freaking nuts (or nuts -er)
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
|
|
|
|
|
Wes Aday wrote: "The text on the button is wrong"
I hear you about people being vague about a problem. I just try my best to give vague responses
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
I just tell them I can't duplicate the issue.
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
|
|
|
|
|
Wes Aday wrote: I just tell them I can't duplicate the issue.
Yup, that one usually works a bit
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Ask your mother. She has to love you...
|
|
|
|
|
Can I display existing access forms from a legacy app in a new C# one instead of having to rewrite the entire system at once?
--
You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
Given that practically anything is possible, I wouldn't rule it out... however, I can't think of an easy way to do this, which would invariably lead to you writing lots of code to make it happen - probably more code than it would take you just to port the app in its entirety.
"It was the day before today.... I remember it like it was yesterday."
-Moleman
|
|
|
|
|
martin_hughes wrote: I wouldn't rule it out... however, I can't think of an easy way to do this
I can't think of anything either, and I'd like to know if it can be done.
"I've seen more information on a frickin' sticky note!" - Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
Well Access does support a fairly rich ActiveX model, so it should be possible to interop in to remote control the old application. The problem is that Access forms don't exist outside of an Access context, so it would be necessary to have Access visible in order to have the forms displayed - to have the forms displayed without the Access application window, if it's possible at all, would probably involve a lot of code, which in terms of the OP's original idea that this would save effort in the short term, doesn't really stack up.
I found this article which may be of use: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317114[^]
Someone (somewhere) may have written a tool to convert Access forms to Winforms, but a cursory Google didn't bring much up.
"It was the day before today.... I remember it like it was yesterday."
-Moleman
|
|
|
|
|
martin_hughes wrote: Access does support a fairly rich ActiveX model
I've seen that and haven't really dove into it very deeply.
martin_hughes wrote: Someone (somewhere) may have written a tool to convert Access forms to Winforms
I've seen one or two a few years ago and they carried a hefty price tag with them.
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
meh. Can't win everything. I wasn't optimistic about getting a go ahead to port parts over, if I can't salvage most of the legacy forms cheaply and easily it's essentially a nonstarter at least for the immediate future.
--
You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
The best way to get help on this is to show a live example of what I want.
Do this:
1) Download, extract and open the visual studio solution
2) Goto Form1.cs and select myUserControl1 (already added to the form)
3) Click the little arrow and the click "Insert new button"
4) Debug the solution.
Form1 will launch and you will see myUserControl1, however, the added button is missing.
The whole idea is to be able to add those buttons (the real thing I want to do is not just that but if I can get this to work, I'll get the other stuff too) in design-time and have them displayed on the form when debugging/running the application.
Here's a few download links for the respective solution:
http://rapidshare.com/files/43271400/ToolStripDesignerTest.zip.html
http://www.gigasize.com/get.php/-1099886665/ToolStripDesignerTest.zip
http://www.sendspace.com/file/zi58tc
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I've searched but haven't found any topic to my problem.
I am now able to download mail with POP3, send mail with SMTP by C#.net
But I don't know how to forward a message in my mail box to another address. I thought of download email and resend it, but an email with large attachments would take alot of time to do that.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks alot for reading.
|
|
|
|
|
Pop3 will download the message to the client. You want to use IMAP (if that's available to you). IMAP can be manipulated on the server side so you don't have to download the large attachments first.
Search on IMAP to get a good understanding on how it's different than the pop3 protocol.
|
|
|
|
|
Can I specify a default value for a group in my regular expression so that if the group does not match I shall use that default value.
I can do by checking the returned groups in my own code But I want to know if this could be done using the Regex.match or somefin like that
o O º(`'·.,(`'·., ☆,.·''),.·'')º O o°
»·'"`»* *☆ t4ure4n ☆* *«·'"`«
°o O º(,.·''(,.·'' ☆`'·.,)`'·.,)º O o°
|
|
|
|
|
It seems not, and rightly so, the RegEx shouldn't return any characters that weren't in the original string. But, yeah, it would be handy in certain cases.
|
|
|
|