|
1. Please add <pre> tags around your code so it is readable like:
std::ifstream is;
is.open(buff, std::ios::binary);
2. Please explain what your problem is.
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
We have developed a COM DLL 64 bit on Windows Server 2008 R2 - 64 bit and this dll is successfully register when visual studio 2010 is installed on the machine but when on a fresh machine its unable to register with following error:
module xxxx.dll failed to load
make sure the binary is stored at the specified path or debug it to check for prob with the binary or dependent dll files
After a lot of investigation, we found that if Microsoft C++ runtime 2010 10.0.3019 is installed, then only dll will be registered. Can anyone provide the required list of dependecy. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 9903065 wrote: Can anyone provide the required list of dependecy.
You should probably try the Microsoft Visual Studio website for that information.
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
You have answered your own question, sort of.
You need the *redistributable* runtime package. Which you deliver along with your own code.
Check the folder of Visual Studio. (Redist)
Q. Hey man! have you sorted out the finite soup machine?
A. Why yes, it's celery or tomato.
modified 12-Mar-13 11:24am.
|
|
|
|
|
I need to play a mp3 file on UPNP device (TV) using program.
Could you help me with related articles or any other information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
Let's say I load a "data.bin" file in dinamic memory using a program.
Now, can I by means of C++ code, find out using another program, if a file called "data.bin" is loaded in memory?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot. Without hacking, you can't read memory of other processes.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
Is calling ReadProcessMemory[^] hacking? It would no doubt end up that way if the OP tried to use it to solve his problem.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Hewitt wrote: Is calling ReadProcessMemory[^] hacking?
Definitely not.
It simply means Carlo wasn't aware that Microsoft gently provides such a function  .
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
What are you trying to accomplish? This sounds like an instance of the XY problem[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Well yes, it is a XY problem. 
When I'm opening a txt file from an application which I made I want to open another instance of this application with the file opened in it. So I don't want to load all the dlls and bins again, but just point to them in the memory (because the files were already loaded by the application which was first opened).
I want to do this because I cannot make the application a MSDI one, because it's to hard to do for me.
modified 12-Mar-13 7:10am.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you can interfere much with how images (executables, not bitmaps) are loaded, but they're partly shared anyway. Don't ask me for too much detail, I'm not very familiar with what exactly windows does with images and/or memory mapped files.
That's all much too complex for such a goal anyway - just look into MDI, it'll be simpler.
|
|
|
|
|
Each process has it's own address space so, in general, it's not possible to just run another instance and "point to them in the memory". If you're worried about DLL's and such beging loaded twice I'd leave the management of virtual memory up to the OS, it's smart enough to map the same physical page into multiple processes when possible.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure of this? In what operating system? I have Win XP and I can tell you for sure that this is not happening because when I open a second app it takes as much time as the first one for all the files and dlls to load. Maybe in higher operating systems all apps point to the same adress in memory but not in XP.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, XP included. I'd guess what you think is taking the time is not the real culprit.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
You say it's taking 15 seconds to start up, this gives plenty of time to break into it 5 or so times with a debugger and get some stack traces to see what it's really up to.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I will do that. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you think it matters if it was loaded twice?
|
|
|
|
|
It will matter because it takes 15 seconds for the app to start.
|
|
|
|
|
DLiviu wrote:
It will matter because it takes 15 seconds for
the app to start.
You know that there are ways to mitigate that right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
DLiviu wrote: No, there aren't.
I guess the number of times I have done it and countless others are just fantasy.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
