|
i want to use button instead of scrollbar on listcontrol
|
|
|
|
|
we know that much already. I have two suggestions for you:
- post an accurate question, providing all information one would need to be able to answer effectively;
- stop creating new threads, simply add messages to your original thread as long as it is about the same subject.
In summary, do as the other enquirers do.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. Three in a row. Do you get the feeling that maybe your question isn't clear? Maybe that's why you're not getting the answer you want?
Here are some questions for you:
1. What is the button supposed to do?
2. Exactly where do you want the button to be displayed? In place of the scrollbar? In a listcontrol cell? Which cell?
3. Do you want the scrollbar to be hidden? Which scrollbar? Horizontal or vertical? Or both?
|
|
|
|
|
i want to use button instead of scrollbar
|
|
|
|
|
rajniyadav1a wrote: i want to use button instead of scrollbar
OK, by this I assume you mean you want to use a button to scroll instead of using the scrollbar.
This is fairly simple to do: create a button on the dialog, and in the button handler send WM_VSCROLL or WM_HSCROLL message. See MSDN for what the message parameters should be.
p.s. Please reply to this message, instead of creating a new message.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're using MFC, you can use the CListCtrl::Scroll method to scroll the contents of the list control.
|
|
|
|
|
how to add button on listcontrol instead of scrollbar.
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean, "instead of scrollbar"? Are you currently adding a button to the scrollbar?
Please be more clear.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Friends
I am creating a win32 application.In that i am using another dll dynamically.
but when I build my application in release mode then Its loading dll but when i build in Hybrid then its not loading dll.
Do I need to change in project settings?
Regards
Yogesh
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible that the DLL is in the 'Release' folder but not in 'Debug' folder?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Is it possible to increase the size of shared memory created using CreateFileMapping/MapViewOfFile during program execution.
|
|
|
|
|
I try to read all ODBC installed on , with this[^] sample , as with modify follow target :
#define IS_KEY _T("SOFTWARE\\ODBC\\ODBCINST.INI")
but it didn't function ... what I didn't understand on this sample is
#define IS_DISPLAY _T("DisplayName")
variable ?!
Thank you .
|
|
|
|
|
Flaviu 2 wrote: I try to read all ODBC installed on , with this sample , as with modify follow target :
#define IS_KEY _T("SOFTWARE\\ODBC\\ODBCINST.INI")
but it didn't function
Flaviu 2 wrote: what I didn't understand on this sample is
<SPAN class=code-preprocessor>#define</SPAN> IS_DISPLAY _T(<SPAN class=code-string>"</SPAN><SPAN class=code-string>DisplayName"</SPAN>)<BR> variable
?!
Your question is very unclear. See here perhaps.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Some people are making such thorough preparation for rainy days that they aren't enjoying today's sunshine." - William Feather
|
|
|
|
|
Ok , here is situation :
#define IS_KEY_LEN 256
#define IS_DISPLAY _T("DisplayName")
#define IS_KEY _T("Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Uninstall")
void CTestRegView::OnHelpReadodbc()
{
HKEY hKey = NULL;
DWORD dwIndex = 0;
LONG lRet;
DWORD cbName = IS_KEY_LEN;
TCHAR szSubKeyName[IS_KEY_LEN];
if (::RegOpenKeyEx(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, IS_KEY, 0, KEY_READ, &hKey) != ERROR_SUCCESS)return;
while((lRet = ::RegEnumKeyEx(hKey, dwIndex, szSubKeyName, &cbName, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)) != ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS)
{
if(lRet == ERROR_SUCCESS)
{
HKEY hItem;
if (::RegOpenKeyEx(hKey, szSubKeyName, 0, KEY_READ, &hItem) != ERROR_SUCCESS)continue;
TCHAR szDisplayName[IS_KEY_LEN];
DWORD dwSize = sizeof(szDisplayName);
DWORD dwType;
if(::RegQueryValueEx(hItem, IS_DISPLAY, NULL, &dwType, (LPBYTE)&szDisplayName, &dwSize) == ERROR_SUCCESS)
{
TRACE("\n %s \n",szDisplayName);
}
::RegCloseKey(hItem);
}
dwIndex++;
cbName = IS_KEY_LEN;
}
::RegCloseKey(hKey);
}
this code , from above list all uninstall programs , but , if I change
#define IS_KEY _T("SOFTWARE\\ODBC\\ODBCINST.INI")
the code doesn't work ...then I ask myself , what is _T("DisplayName") which is paramenter 2 on ::RegQueryValueEx method ?
|
|
|
|
|
I found here[^] an solution ...
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
i need some suggestions with this problem, after start my application does nothing until the user give some input to dialog.
but the cursor is always as "wait-cursor" showed!?
On Spy++ the only messages that are active are this wm_kickidle messages.
Now, this is only if my application runs on 64bit system (ms windows), not on 32bit???
Does any one have idea about how to solve this?
regards
arrin
|
|
|
|
|
I've declared an array like that in a header (the code should be a pure C code):
int someMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y];
and I want to use it as a global variable. The problem is if I include that header in another file I get a linker error that this variable was already defined and I'm really stuck here and I have absolutely no clue what's going on and how I'm missing the point.
If I use static it is fine but it isn't global any more.
"extern int gameMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y];" doesn't work as I'm expecting. I get the linker error even if I don't use the array in any files.
modified on Thursday, April 7, 2011 6:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
In the header file declare it as extern int someMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y];
Give the declaration int someMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y]; in any one of the .cpp files.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your reply.
Well, my code is supposed to be a C code.
|
|
|
|
|
Just replace CPP in my reply with C.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you! It was a lame problem.
BTW Very interesting article.
|
|
|
|
|
int someMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y]; allocates memory for an array; if you include that statement in a header file, then include that header file in N different C files, you end up allocating N arrays, all with the same name, and the linker will complain as it can't have data blocks with global scope and conflicting names.
extern int someMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y]; says: "there is an array somewhere, but this by itself does not allocate it"; so inserting that in the header file tells your C files they get access to the array, without allocating memory at all, and without creating linker problems. Of course you still need a single int someMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y]; in one of the C files to actually allocate the memory; and that C file better also include the header file with the extern statement.
[ADDED]
One elegant way of dealing with all this is described in Stefan63's message below.
[/ADDED]
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
modified on Thursday, April 7, 2011 9:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! Amazing explanation! Thank you so much!
|
|
|
|
|
you're welcome.
In software development, getting things to work may be the goal, understanding how each part works is a necessary step to get things to work reliably.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have plenty of such variables or declarations you can use a macro to automatically use the declaration in your header file as a definition exactly once:
#ifndef GLOBALS_H
#define GLOBALS_H
#ifdef GLOBALS_C
# define MYGLOBAL_API
#else
# define MYGLOBAL_API extern
#endif
MYGLOBAL_API int someMap[MAPSIZE_X][MAPSIZE_Y];
#undef MYGLOBAL_API // clean up - we won't need that symbol outside this header
#endif
#define GLOBALS_C // MYGLOBAL_API will be resolved to empty string
#include "globals.h"
#include "globals.h"
Using this technique, adding another global variable just requires adding it to globals.h, you never have to touch globals.c (or any other file) for that purpose!
That said, it is always a good idea to keep the number of globals to a minimum, or, if possible, not use any at all. It's always very difficult to track an error that leaves a global in a bad state, because the problem may be caused anywhere in your program!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
