|
Cedric Moonen wrote: char portName[] = "\\\\.\\COM6";
did it, but now I am doubting myself... I believe I've tested this solution but I'm not sure anymore.
Anyway... thanks
Frank Peeters
|
|
|
|
|
Cedric Moonen wrote: As far as I remember, you have to specify the port name this way on WinCE:
char portName[] = "\\\\.\\COM6";
I thought this format was required only for COM ports 10 and higher. 
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
I'm writing a SDI windows win32 .exe program using Visual C++ 6.0. If in the future I want the program to run on PCs other than with the Windows Operating system, is there anything I should incorporate into the code now, or is it compatible with most other operating systems already, or does it need to be rewritten?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I've not used it myself, but if you're using fairly plain win32 code (ie, not wacky libraries), then you may be able to use WINE to run your program on linux (or maybe most unices).
You may also want to look at some llibraries like Qt (off the top of my head) which are on most systems, so you'd just need to recompile for a different OS.
If your program does clever algorithmic things, you could make that part OS independent, and write OS dependent front ends...
Lots of choices!
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
Visual C++, MFC, Win32, etc., are from Microsoft and they are specific to develop software for Microsoft Windows.
If you need tools to write a cross platform program, have a look at the following URLs:
Visual Component Framework[^]
Cross Platform Programming[^]
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You won't be able to do that. MFC is for windows only. Anyway, even if your code was 100% system independant, you still would need to recompile it for a different platform (the binaries are totally different).
If you want to make something portable, you will need to make your code portable, you will need to get rid of every call to the win32 API (and get rid of MFC, completely). However, don't panic, there is a cross-platform alternative to MFC: wxWidgets[^]. If you have experience with MFC, it shouldn't be too difficult to switch because it is more or less similar (in usage I mean).
Good luck, it is probably more complicated than you think...
|
|
|
|
|
Java?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
better look for library like WxWidget and QT for this, MFC is specific for windows.
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/codeProject$$>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naively: because a (raw) pointer is not an object.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Naively: because a (raw) pointer is not an object
what is original question??
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/codeProject$$>
|
|
|
|
|
He was asking while relational operators cannot be overloaded for pointers.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
I dont know why you delete your question?
|
|
|
|
|
indian trade secrets? 
|
|
|
|
|
Oh really can I learn it of you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am designing a small budget assignment/checking application for a hierarchy organization structure. The purpose is to check and assign the budget for each employee not exceeds the total budget of a department.
The most difficult part is, a sub-department's total budget is not always lower than the upper level department's budget (i.e. the organization tree does not 100% reflects the relationship that father department node's budget is always more than that of child department node).
So, I put many exception rules to check in such situation. I am wondering whether there is any smarter ways to implement and represent the budget assignment and check model?
(I can re-write anything in this application, including data structure and algorithm, if the budget assignment and checking function is met.)
An example,
department goo under larger department foo, is represented as, /foo/goo, and /foo/zoo's budget is lower than /foo (this is a normal senses), but /foo/goo's budget is larger than /foo(this is a special rule, in the business model, even if goo under management of foo, its budget is not controlled by foo, so larger), and I maintain the remaining budget for each department,
for employee, /foo/emp1 and /foo/zoo/emp2, I can check from father node to child node for making all child nodes' budget not exceed father node, but for /foo/goo/emp3, I have to check specially. This is my headache.
If there are any smarter ways to represent the data structure and budget check, I would appreciated.
thanks in advance,
George
|
|
|
|
|
You're working on a real project? Not just technical fun?
The world is changing...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Hi CPallini,
How do you call a real project? This is an issue I met with in a C++ project, it is not homework. A couple of guys want to make something fun and cool.
Any ideas? Smart guy?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: A couple of guys want to make something fun and cool
Good luck!
George_George wrote: Any ideas?
Find out yourself: having ideas is the real fun.
George_George wrote: Smart guy?
Probably you're smarter than me.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Let us wait for others' idea. My idea is too narrow.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
Traditionally this sort of thing is done with tables, often database tables. You might have one table with every budget holder listed and their budget and then one or more consolidation tables expressing the budget grouping rules. Without knowing the details of what you're doing it's difficult to say exactly how it will work best. You could construct the same sort of logical structure with indexed lists or multi-dimensional arrays, sparse arrays if you've got a high dimensional data set.
One key thing in all cases is to identify a 'budget holder' as a type of entity whether that is always a person or sometimes a department or company or whatever. You'll find the coding works out much easier if it has some way of directly representing this key role. The next step might be to identify the set of relationship between budget holders in your complex hierarchy and then try to represent each of those relationships unambigously either as a type or in terms of a data structure.
Don't be afraid to tear up the design and start agiain a few times. I'm sure you'll soon have an efficient mapping from the real world onto a C++ class structure and back again. Good luck
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Matthew,
Do you mean using one table to store budget holder information, and mapping the related budget grouping rules to the budget holders, using data structures like indexed lists or multi-dimensional arrays, sparse arrays?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
That's certainly one way you could do it.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Matthew,
Your insights give me more ideas. Now I make the algorithm in details and want to let you review and
comment. Sorry, I do not adope 100% of your ideas.
1. Any node can have multiple childs, for example, foo has goo and zoo as two childs;
2. If each child has its special money management system, I will put a special pointer to the money object, or else, it will share the same money source from parent (its money pointer points to the same money object of that of parent);
3. In the money object, it contains the pool of nodes which gets money from the object and how much each node gets from the money object, from total amount of money of the money object, and the consumed money by all the nodes, we can make sure how much remains;
4. When checking/assigning remaining budget for a specific child, traverse from the parent (root) of the tree to the specific child, and check its "money pointer" to see the remaining amount of money.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)