|
I may have been a little presumptuous. My current project is comprised of three subprojects, one of which is a help file. That's how I go about disabling it when the help file does not need to be built.
Try this. Open the Project Settings dialog (Alt+F7). Select the .hpj file in the file list, and then click Custom Build tab.
"Money talks. When my money starts to talk, I get a bill to shut it up." - Frank
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
ahhh ... the *.hpj-file resides in the list of cpp-files! And there i can disable the generating of the help files ...  )
Thanks for help!!!
Greetings from Frank!
|
|
|
|
|
When you create your project, you selected the option that turns on the context sensitive help system. To prevent this, don't select that option in the future. To correct this, you have to go through your project settings and remove the sections that deal with generating help files.
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
HELLO
I copied a code from the microsoft documentation in order to list loca eventlogs
but it seems to be writed for .NET version.
but it dosen't work also in .net studio
can Someone help me?
#using <mscorlib.dll>
#using <system.dll>
using namespace System;
using namespace System::Diagnostics;
using namespace System::Threading;
int main()
{
// TODO: Place code here.
EventLog* localEventLogs[];
localEventLogs = EventLog::GetEventLogs();
Console::WriteLine(S"Number of logs on local computer: {0}", __box(localEventLogs->Length));
System::Collections::IEnumerator* myEnum = localEventLogs->GetEnumerator();
while (myEnum->MoveNext())
{
EventLog* log = __try_cast<eventlog*>(myEnum->Current);
Console::WriteLine(S"Log: {0}", log->Log);
}
return 0;
}
|
|
|
|
|
yep, that's managed C++. That'll work in VC2005 Express Edition ( which is free ), but it's never going to work in VC6.
What version of VC do you have ? MAnaged syntax changed significantly between VS2003 and VS2005. This looks like VS2005 syntax to me, but I'm not sure.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
I have both VC++ 2005 and VC++6
but it didn't work in any of them
|
|
|
|
|
OK, well, it CAN'T work in VC6. In VC2005, you need to provide a little more information if you want people to be able to help you. What did it do ? What version are you using ? What's the code look like ( it looks to me like your original snippet is missing some stuff ).
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
fx9200 wrote: ...it dosen't work also in .net studio
Why not? What's the problem? Copying code and then saying it doesn't work is not very helpful.
"Money talks. When my money starts to talk, I get a bill to shut it up." - Frank
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
That's Managed C++ syntax, not C++/CLI. It'll work directly in VS2003, but for 2005, you'll need to use the /clr:oldSyntax switch.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I'm trying to use a DLL compiled with VS2005 C++ with a .exe compiled in VC6, and although the .exe compiles and links with no problem, when I run it it crashes on trying to access the DLL.
Any ideas?
Steve.
Asynes yw brassa ages kwilkynyow.
|
|
|
|
|
viaduct wrote: Any ideas?
No but if you use your debugger, you'll have a lot more information of what's happening.
|
|
|
|
|
Erm, not sure if you're taking the piss there, but I had actually thought of that myself. The crash occurs at the end of a massive stack of system calls with only addresses and no function names, so there isn't much to go on.
Asynes yw brassa ages kwilkynyow.
|
|
|
|
|
Mmmh, one thing that comes to my mind: did you check if they are both linked to the same run-time library ? (single threaded, multi-threaded, ...)
|
|
|
|
|
To turn those addresses into function names, you need the debugging symbols for the OS. See here[^] for how to set up VS2005 to automatically grab the matching debugging symbols from a Microsoft web server, as required.
|
|
|
|
|
char *p= "test string";
p[5] = '_';
This code will fail. why?
My Assumption: "test string" remaining in memory as a constant pointer, hence it modifying teh same fails.
it would be helpful if you let me know how compiler handling such definitions and how it resides in memory
|
|
|
|
|
String literals are constant. For historical reasons you can use char * (when you really should only be able to use const char *) in this case.
See here[^] to see what Microsoft has to say about this.
|
|
|
|
|
Sarath.<fon wrote:<="" div="">This code will fail. why?
It's the difference between arrays and pointers. Had you used the following, it would have worked:
char p[] = "test string";
p[5] = '_';
|
|
|
|
|
Just an FYI:
It is VERY bad to declare an array this way and then modify it. In this case, it won't hurt anything, but lets say you tried something like:
char p[] = "hello";<br />
p[5] = ',';<br />
p[6] = ' ';<br />
p[7] = 'W';<br />
p[8] = 'o';<br />
p[9] = 'r';<br />
p[10] = 'l';<br />
p[11] = 'd';
Now you have overwritten parts in memory that were not allocated for that string. With few exceptions, you should always specify a size for your arrays:
char p[30] = "hello, world!";
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
I think, Null char to be added to p[12].
|
|
|
|
|
You can think it, but it'd still be wrong.
"Money talks. When my money starts to talk, I get a bill to shut it up." - Frank
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Adding NULL to p[12] would still cause a segmentation fault (aka crash). Since the array was not declared with any bounds, it defaults to the size of the initailized string (which is 6 for "hello"). Any character that is written past that size is overwriting something in memory that may or may not be important. If it overwrites, for example, the next instruction on the stack ... you get the idea. The point is, you should always declare arrays with a size.
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Writing windows service in c++.Net 2005 it’s clear, but I’ve problems when I
Want to write a windows service in C++.Net 2005 but with unmanaged code.
I’ll appreciate if anyone can give me a clue/hint.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
yosm wrote: but I’ve problems
yosm wrote: I’ll appreciate if anyone can give me a clue/hint.
HINT: You did not state any specific "problem".
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I know overloading is and i know overriding in virtual functions.But when i overload an overriding functions, something differnet.
<br />
#include <iostream><br />
<br />
using namespace std;<br />
class CBase<br />
{<br />
public:<br />
virtual void func(char n)<br />
{<br />
cout << "base";<br />
};<br />
<br />
};<br />
<br />
class CDerived : public CBase<br />
{<br />
public:<br />
virtual void func(int n)<br />
{<br />
cout << " derived";<br />
}<br />
};<br />
<br />
int main(int argc, char *argv[])<br />
{<br />
CBase* BaseForDerived = new CDerived;<br />
double y=123.45;<br />
int n=100;<br />
long d= 9;<br />
BaseForDerived->func(y);<br />
BaseForDerived->func(n);<br />
BaseForDerived->func(d);<br />
CDerived x;<br />
x.func('c');<br />
delete BaseForDerived;<br />
}<br />
Here if i write virtual void func(int n) instead of virtual void func(char n) it shows me derived for all.For first 3 it shows me base the last it shows me derived.But i confused.
Does overloading a virtual function ,in derived class mean a new function declariton?
If so why it shows me for x.func('c'); derived but not BASE.
If not why this code shows me for func() base class.I gave int parameter.
I really confused.
I am looking for your answers.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Late in C++ standardisation, the type of a single-character literal was changed from int (as it is in C89) to char. You may be using an out-of-date compiler which has not yet reflected this change.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
