C / C++ / MFC Discussion Boards

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

CPallini7-Oct-09 0:28

CPallini

7-Oct-09 0:28

Rakesh5 wrote:
if i say, const wchar* test = L"hello";
const BYTE* test1 = (const BYTE*)test; o/p will be 'h' alone..

If you do need to convert the wide char string into a char one, then use a conversion macro instead, for instance (assuming a ANSI build, like yours):

const wchar_t * wstrTest = L"Hello";
CW2A strTest( wstrTest );
AfxMessageBox( strTest);

Rakesh5 wrote:
my seniors have used a functions in which they have typecast like wat i have mentioned in the first message..

I hope your seniors know what they are doing.

Smile | :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke

[My articles]

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

Rakesh57-Oct-09 2:08

Rakesh5

7-Oct-09 2:08

Hi, Actually i have made my character set as unicode and not as multibyte in the project settings.. so its not converting fully..

is there any way to do by keeping the current settings?

thanks,
rakesh.

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

CPallini7-Oct-09 2:16

CPallini

7-Oct-09 2:16

Then use

const wchar_t * wstrTest = L"Hello";
CW2A strTest( wstrTest );
AfxMessageBox( (CString) strTest);

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

Rajesh R Subramanian7-Oct-09 0:29

Rajesh R Subramanian

7-Oct-09 0:29

A BYTE is an 8 bit data type. A WCHAR is a 16 bit data type.

Now, you can cast a BYTE pointer to a WCHAR pointer or vice versa. However, since these data types are of different sizes, and if you cast an array of BYTES to an array of WCHARs, the conversion will succeed, but the resultant buffer will be unusable (the code "won't work"). In other words, you only casted the pointer.

You can call a horse a dog, but however, it won't bark. OK, I know. That's not a good example, but you get the drift. Smile | :)

Rakesh5 wrote:
my seniors have used a functions in which they have typecast like wat i have mentioned in the first message..they are sending type-cast parameter as an arugment to other functions..but it is not casting properly....its taking the first character alone..

I have a feeling that your seniors are not the brightest sparks for you to learn from. Or ask them to give you an explanation of what they're trying to achieve and ask them how such a "conversion" could make sense.

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

KarstenK7-Oct-09 1:24

KarstenK

7-Oct-09 1:24

const BYTE* test1 = (const BYTE*) test;

is a type cast, it means your are changing the pointer type.

Search for "String Conversion". It is a wide area. There are some fine ATL-macros: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/87zae4a3%28VS.80%29.aspx[^] Suspicious | :suss:

Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

David Crow7-Oct-09 3:17

David Crow

7-Oct-09 3:17

Simply casting an 8-bit type to a 16-bit type is not going to produce the expected result. Consider:

 8 8 8 8 8
╓─╥─╥─╥─╥─╖
║H║e║l║l║o║
╙─╨─╨─╨─╨─╜

 16  16  16  16  16
╓─┬─╥─┬─╥─┬─╥─┬─╥─┬─╖
║H│0║e│0║l│0║l│0║o│0║
╙─┴─╨─┴─╨─┴─╨─┴─╨─┴─╜

In the top figure, each character uses 1 byte or 8 bits. In the bottom figure, each character uses 2 byte or 16 bits. The second byte holds a \0 character. Casting will not magically add that character.

"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

Rajesh R Subramanian7-Oct-09 3:23

Rajesh R Subramanian

7-Oct-09 3:23

Nice illustration, David.

But the Unicode string in the figure seem to have been terminated by a single '0' character, whereas it should be 2 '0's. Smile | :)

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

David Crow7-Oct-09 3:26

David Crow

7-Oct-09 3:26

Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
But the Unicode string in the figure seem to have been terminated...

Actually, neither is terminated. I didn't deem that important.

Re: convert const wchar* to const byte*

Rajesh R Subramanian7-Oct-09 3:30

Rajesh R Subramanian

7-Oct-09 3:30

Oh yeah. I only looked at the Unicode text. Blush | :O

And yes, the illustration serves the purpose well.

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

reg interview....

thangvel6-Oct-09 21:44

thangvel

6-Oct-09 21:44

hai,

as a begineer in VC++ 6.0 programmer what are all the areas should i have strong knowledge........?
waiting for ur reply..

thank u'.......... Roll eyes | :rolleyes:

Re: reg interview....

CPallini6-Oct-09 21:49

CPallini

6-Oct-09 21:49

thangvel wrote:
as a begineer in VC++ 6.0 programmer what are all the areas should i have strong knowledge........?

Visual C++ 2010?
Smile | :)

Re: reg interview....

Richard MacCutchan6-Oct-09 22:13

Richard MacCutchan

6-Oct-09 22:13

thangvel wrote:
as a begineer in VC++ 6.0 programmer what are all the areas should i have strong knowledge........?

It is more important to have a solid understanding of the C++ language than any IDE.

Re: reg interview....

Rajesh R Subramanian6-Oct-09 22:17

Rajesh R Subramanian

6-Oct-09 22:17

Seriously: The questions you will be asked may depend on how long have you been working on windows programming.

MFC:
Doc/View architecture (along with menus, splitter windows, rebars, scroll views, etc.,)
Dialog applications
Controls
Common controls
Thread basics (MFC thread classes and ~~the hopelessly broken~~ thread sync implementation of MFC)
GDI Basics
Message mapping in MFC (OK, you know it. But how does it work?)
COM (depends if you're into it or not)

Windows API: There's aplenty.

General: OOP, C++ language (very important)

Seriously 2: Use Google.

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Re: reg interview....

santhosh-padamatinti7-Oct-09 0:20

santhosh-padamatinti

7-Oct-09 0:20

hi,

go through this link:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/hi-in/library/ms235630(en-us).aspx[^]

and also follow MSDN(microsoft development network).

sampath-padamatinti

Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Hari_166-Oct-09 21:29

Hari_16

6-Oct-09 21:29

Hi All,

I am having a UI thread and in the controlling function of the UI thread I am doing certain operations , but once the function gets over my thread exits .. so is there anyway i can stop this and make sure the thread exits only when i call suspendthread().

Please help me on this issue

Thanks,
Hari

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Code-o-mat6-Oct-09 21:46

Code-o-mat

6-Oct-09 21:46

Show some code, please, relevant parts should be enough to start with, btw, SuspendThread[^] doesn't "exit the thread", it just suspends its execution.

> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. <
> Sometimes you just have to hate coding to do it well. <

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

CPallini6-Oct-09 21:54

CPallini

6-Oct-09 21:54

This makes me recalling: "The Old New Thing: Why you should never suspend a thread".
Smile | :)

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Rajesh R Subramanian6-Oct-09 22:05

Rajesh R Subramanian

6-Oct-09 22:05

hraman1987 wrote:
but once the function gets over my thread exits

How possibly can an UI thread exit without you posting a WM_QUIT to its message loop? Confused | :confused:

Are you even sure that it's an UI thread? Can you show me your relevant code?

Also, why would you EVER suspend a UI thread? If there are no messages to be processed, the thread is automatically blocked on the message loop.

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Hari_166-Oct-09 23:31

Hari_16

6-Oct-09 23:31

Sorry Let me rephrase it better ...

My'n is a DialogBased Application .... in dialog class i create a thread..

m_pThread = AfxBeginThread(RUNTIME_CLASS(CMyUIThread),THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL,0,CREATE_SUSPENDED);
m_pThread->ResumeThread();
m_pThread->PostThreadMessage(WM_MYTHREADMESSAGE,NULL,NULL);

Thread Class:

void MyConsumerThread::MyConsumerThreadHandler(WPARAM,LPARAM)
{
..................
......................

}

My question is once the control reaches the end of this function.. i want the control to saty in the function and not exit it..

Please help me out with this and sorry for bad phrasing of the previous message.

Thanks

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Rajesh R Subramanian6-Oct-09 23:39

Rajesh R Subramanian

6-Oct-09 23:39

hraman1987 wrote:
m_pThread = AfxBeginThread(RUNTIME_CLASS(CMyUIThread),THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL,0,CREATE_SUSPENDED);
m_pThread->ResumeThread();
m_pThread->PostThreadMessage(WM_MYTHREADMESSAGE,NULL,NULL);

My question is once the control reaches the end of this function.. i want the control to saty in the function and not exit it..

If that's what you need, then using an UI thread is fundamentally wrong. In an UI thread, by blocking the control within a handler, you will block the thread from processing further messages posted to the message loop.

What you need is a worker thread with a spin loop to check for exit condition.

Go with something like:

volatile BOOL bExit = FALSE;

UINT ThreadFunc(LPVOID pData)
{
  while(bExit == FALSE) //spin condition
  {
     //Thread code here.
  }
  return FALSE;
}

void CMyDialog::OnBeginTask()
{
  AfxBeginThread(ThreadFunc, myData);  //Whatever myData points to should be valid until the thread dies...
}

When you need the thread to die, set bExit to TRUE. That's all you need. Not an UI thread, no need to derive a class from CWinThread.

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

David Crow7-Oct-09 3:21

David Crow

7-Oct-09 3:21

hraman1987 wrote:
I am having a UI thread...

There's really no such thing. Do you mean a thread with a message pump?

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Rajesh R Subramanian7-Oct-09 3:24

Rajesh R Subramanian

7-Oct-09 3:24

DavidCrow wrote:
There's really no such thing. Do you mean a thread with a message pump?

Hehe... I've always had the same sentiment. Whoever gave that name to it was probably drunk. Big Grin | :-D

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Hari_168-Oct-09 18:28

Hari_16

8-Oct-09 18:28

Thanks a lot your suggestions were helpful , i have changed to worker thread and its working fine

Re: Making a Thread wait and not exit after the controlling function exits

Rajesh R Subramanian8-Oct-09 19:44

Rajesh R Subramanian

8-Oct-09 19:44

You're welcome. You can mark the helpful replies by clicking "Good Answer". Smile | :)

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Reg Database

thangvel6-Oct-09 21:26

thangvel

6-Oct-09 21:26

hai everybody,
please anyone tell me How to create a MS ACESS database file and add table on it during run time in a dialog based application using VC++ 6.0 ......?

thank u........ Rose | [Rose]

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.