|
I have some better solution:
I use the changes mentionend and additionally, I use a new category CodeProject and limit the Technical Blog Feed by using a 'hidden' RSS feature (see also http://wordpress-as-cms.com/permalinks/hidden-feeds-categories-tags-authors-search-terms-links/[^]) of wordpress to feed only posts with category CodeProject:
"http://www.hjgode.de/wp/category/codeproject/feed/"
So I can adjust which Posts are feed to my Technical Blog at CodeProject.
Better solution?
regards
Josef
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amazing.
I've put your entry as a Editor's Choice, and will use it for future Wordpress users from here on out. Great work JosefThanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have made the below article post to code project via my technical blog, but as it was taking more than 24 hours to be approved to publish in codeproject, I thought of deleting it and repost from my blog again, but seems this is not working, so can you do the necessary to make the below article of mine appear in codeproject as normal article?
Article link :
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/49155/Visual-Studio-2010-New-Features-in-Debugging-Excit.aspx
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Any updates on this please ??
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Ashoka,
Your article should be live now and ready for any updates you need to apply. Please let me know if you have any further problems
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I'm writing article about a C#/.NET port of MetaWidget project. I'm planning to embedd into it a YouTube screencast about usage of this tool. I already made some. Please tell me what You think about sharpness of video, sound etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbPmWB0CNpo
Comments, constructive critisism are welcome
Adrian
[EDIT]
VIDEO temporary deleted, new version should be online soon
Adrian Pasik
modified on Monday, December 28, 2009 1:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Looks great!
We can't embed YouTube yet, but you can definitely link to it
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian,
I think this is terrific. I'm very excited to hear of a .NET Metawidget port, and would be very keen to work with you to help you as much as you need.
That said, I have some concerns about your port as it stands. Looking at the YouTube video, the API of your port (the structure of the methods, the annotations etc) appear to differ significantly from the original version. I am worried this would cause confusion for people trying to 'evaluate Metawidget' as a brand, because if they evaluate it on one platform they will have a very different experience to another platform.
I'd be keen to either work with you to bring the API of the port in line, or I'd ask you not to call it 'Metawidget' or a 'port' as such. You could still call it a '.NET UI Generator' or something like that. A good example of a 'port' would be the Hibernate/NHibernate project, where the NHibernate API closely mirrors the original.
Regards,
Richard.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you're right.
I think it would be good if i change the title of this project and make an article to let people know there are ways to make them more productive. And then i will consult with You and write entire port from scratch.
Adrian
Adrian Pasik
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian,
Thank you for being so understanding. I am sorry to be so 'lawyer-ish' about this. Good luck with writing your article.
If you'd still like to tackle a Metawidget .NET port (which would be fantastic), some key goals would be:
1. Close similarity to the original API
2. Interprobability of Inspectors (ie. have a .NET frontend generated from a Java back-end)
3. Base classes with shared functionality across .NET techologies (ie. WinForms and ASP.NET)
Of course, in porting Metawidget to a new platform you may encounter deficiencies in the API and I would love that feedback: a key goal of Metawidget is that it should adapt to whatever front-end/back-end architecture you use, so the API needs to be very accomodating.
Look forward to hearing from you,
Richard.
P.S. Could you please re-do your YouTube video so that it doesn't call the project Metawidget?
P.P.S. How did you make that video? I really like it and should do something similar for the Java version.
|
|
|
|
|
> P.P.S. How did you make that video? I really like it and should do something similar for the Java version.
On Windows i used Camtasia with Windows Media Video(ffdshow) 1st pass + 600 kbit/s bandwidth + 800x600 res
Adrian Pasik
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to write an article about "creating a programming language" based in Java virtual machine, and a very small programming language for demonstration, but :
0 - this types of articles has accepted?
1 - I'm not real document writer , how I can found members to helping me to write it?
best regards!
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds interesting, go for it!
And yes, we have Code Project Mentors to help people get articles ready to publish on Code Project (they don't do the writing for you, but make suggestions)
The best way to start is to go to our submission page and read our guidelines. Then do your best to follow them and post the article, and if it needs help after that I will ask one of our Mentors to see if they can help
If you have any questions please let me know
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have submit article by mail, and I want know time needed for replaying, for comments etc... ?
best regards!
|
|
|
|
|
We are currently on the Christmas / New Year break so your article will be processed first thing next week.
Thanks!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
thank you,
no worry I want just know it, just for organizing my time
& happy holidays!
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting topic. A micro Java language... Is it like a DSL or somthing like that?
~TheArch
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this is very small, like Mini Java.
in reality, mini Java is very big if we compared them !
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
I believe this should be corrected:
In this survey for Best C# article of November 2009,
the link to Genuilder article is broken.
The survey page points to this link:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/genuilder.aspx
But since the page has been moved, the new link for this article is this:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/codegen/genuilder.aspx
So, if you click on the first (incorrect) link, the site shows this message:
<<page not="" found
unfortunately="" the="" page="" you="" requested="" was="" found.
the="" following="" is="" most="" likely="" location
•genuilder=""
nicolas="" dorier="" updated:="" 10="" nov="" 2009="">>
Although the message above shows that the article has been moved, I think this big bold "Page Not Found" message on the top may suggest to many of the readers that Nicolas' article has been *deleted*. Besides, all other links in that survey page point to the correct url. I think it would be fair to correct that link to the correct article url.
|
|
|
|
|
P.S.: The Survey Results page also shows the broken link:
http://www.codeproject.com/Surveys/986/Best-Csharp-article-of-November-2009.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed. Thanks!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|