|
the items presenter to show the items.
Here's a default template for a ListView you can use as a starting place:
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ListBorder" Color="#828790"/>
<Style x:Key="ListViewStyle1" TargetType="{x:Type ListView}">
<Setter Property="Background" Value="{DynamicResource {x:Static SystemColors.WindowBrushKey}}"/>
<Setter Property="BorderBrush" Value="{StaticResource ListBorder}"/>
<Setter Property="BorderThickness" Value="1"/>
<Setter Property="Foreground" Value="{DynamicResource {x:Static SystemColors.ControlTextBrushKey}}"/>
<Setter Property="ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility" Value="Auto"/>
<Setter Property="ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility" Value="Auto"/>
<Setter Property="ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll" Value="true"/>
<Setter Property="VerticalContentAlignment" Value="Center"/>
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type ListView}">
<Border x:Name="Bd" SnapsToDevicePixels="true" Background="{TemplateBinding Background}" BorderBrush="{TemplateBinding BorderBrush}" BorderThickness="{TemplateBinding BorderThickness}" Padding="1">
<ScrollViewer Padding="{TemplateBinding Padding}" Focusable="false">
<ItemsPresenter SnapsToDevicePixels="{TemplateBinding SnapsToDevicePixels}"/>
</ScrollViewer>
</Border>
<ControlTemplate.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsEnabled" Value="false">
<Setter Property="Background" TargetName="Bd" Value="{DynamicResource {x:Static SystemColors.ControlBrushKey}}"/>
</Trigger>
<Trigger Property="IsGrouping" Value="true">
<Setter Property="ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll" Value="false"/>
</Trigger>
</ControlTemplate.Triggers>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
The link wasn't helpful .
I've used ItemsPresenter
|
|
|
|
|
i have a problem with binden 2 controls. one is in the headertemplate and the other one is in the celltemplate. as you can see i have a checkbox(x:Name="chboCheckAll") in my headertemplate and the other checkbox is in the celltemplate(x:Name="chboCheckOld"). what i want is that when i check the checkbox in my headertemplate the checkbox in my celltemplate gets update with the value in the headertemplate. how can i achieve this?? thank you for the help
<my:DataGridTemplateColumn>
<my:DataGridTemplateColumn.HeaderTemplate >
<DataTemplate>
<Border x:Name="border">
<Grid x:Name="grid">
<CheckBox x:Name="chboCheckAll" Grid.Column="1" IsChecked="True"></CheckBox>
</Grid>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
</my:DataGridTemplateColumn.HeaderTemplate>
<my:DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<CheckBox x:Name="chboCheckOld" Content="{Binding Path=Old}" IsChecked="{Binding ElementName=chboCheckAll, Path=IsChecked}></CheckBox>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</my:DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</my:DataGridTemplateColumn>
|
|
|
|
|
If I was doing this, I'd normally update the model behind this, and let binding update the checkboxes rather than specifically update the checkboxes.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats Pete. Saw your article in yesterday's "UK MSDN Flash". 
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that. It was a real problem keeping an article I'm passionate about down to 500 words. There was a severe amount of pruning involved.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a datatable as
DataTable dt = new DataTable( "Table1" );
dt.Columns.Add( "c1" );
dt.Columns.Add( "c2" );
dt.Columns.Add( "c3" );
DataRow dr = dt.NewRow();
dr["c1"] = "100";
dr["c2"] = "100";
dr["c3"] = "100";
dt.Rows.Add( dr );
dt.AcceptChanges();
printListView.DataContext = dt;
I have also a listview for showing the table.
<ListView
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
SelectionMode="Single"
ItemsSource="{Binding}"
Name="printListView"
Margin="10">
<ListView.View>
<GridView>
<GridViewColumn Header="c1" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding c1}"/>
<GridViewColumn Header="c2" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding c2}"/>
<GridViewColumn Header="c3" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding c3}"/>
</GridView>
</ListView.View>
</ListView>
How can I print this table?
Thanks
Prajeesh Prabhakar
|
|
|
|
|
What I would do is create a FixedDocument which contains a Table that uses the datasource that you are using here, rather than using a ListView. Then, you use a DocumentPaginator and use this with PrintDialog.PrintDocument.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
How do you change the protection level of a control within a usercontrol when said usercontrol is in a WPF usercontrol library?
In my solution, I have a a WPF UserControl library project that contains several UserControl objects.
Ive got a WPF Application project that contains a window object that uses two user controls - one is a toolbar (in the library project), and the other is a general content control in the application project.
I'm trying to add a button handler for a toolbar button. Because the controls inside a user control are all marked as "internal", I can't add a button handler in the "code behind" (what a stupid f*ckin way to have to say "real goddamn code", but I gigress).
So how do I accomplish what I want if all the frakking controls are internal?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
modified on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
You probably want your toolbar button to be bound to a command:
Open...
If it is a standard command, such as file open, use the commands provided by the ApplicationCommands class as shown above. If not, create and register your own new command (must be static).
In your app code, bind a method to that command. That method will get called when the command "is raised". It's just like registering for an event, with one level of decoupling.
This "decoupling" between the UI and the rest of the app is a key idea of WPF. In WPF, you should not be directly linking to event handlers of a specific button. By using a command, the UI can be changed from a button to some other control type, and the command is still the same. If you wiered up directly to the event handler, then if you change the button to another type, you would have to find all places that event was being handled, and then change the event handler signature.
I've only been using WPF for about 2 months, and I share your frustration. You must see the WPF light  resistance is futile...
Mitch
|
|
|
|
|
barker770 wrote: This "decoupling" between the UI and the rest of the app is a key idea of WPF
Are you sure? We've been doing that for years before WPF came along. I thought there was more to it than that.
barker770 wrote: You must see the WPF light
You could have used a CP Holy Grail Smiley right about then eh?
|
|
|
|
|
John - you can change the visibility of controls by specifying a FieldModifier, e.g. x:FieldModifier="public".
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I found that out, but somehow it didn't seem to be the "WPF way". The guy before you posted what I think might be the "WPF way". Have I mentioned how badly WPF sucks yet today?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Have I mentioned how badly WPF sucks yet today
I don't think you have at least not enough. I think you're starting to get into a love\ hate relationship with it. Just ask it out on a date already!!!
|
|
|
|
|
I actually do love hating it because in my own way, I'm justified in hating it.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Have I mentioned how badly WPF sucks yet today?
I'm still standing on the sidelines watching. Sort of like the jury is still out, you know? I mean the historical perspective on WPF could end up being, "The best implementation of a bad idea ever". Of course there can be no doubt that my perspective will be proved wrong one day when computers just do what we want them to do without us having to tell them what to do.  ![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: my perspective will be proved wrong one day when computers just do what we want them to do without us having to tell them what to do
Never going to happen[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi peoples,
I am working in WPF screen,
i need to clear all the controls(values) in the screen at one stretch,
if win forms we can give as (foreach control in this.controls)
but here how can we do??
|
|
|
|
|
Please use the following code in C#
this.Content = null;
Continue...
|
|
|
|
|
This doesn't work with TextBoxes, TextBlocks or Labels.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a silverlight project folder and need to refer an file inside a folder(named as "MyFolder") which is at the same level of the silverlight projec, but not inside the solution.
I want to get the path for that folder so that I can access the contents of "MyFolder"?
I have tried :
string path = Path.GetDirectoryName(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location);
but its giving me "Access denied exception"
I want to do it from xaml.cs file....
Can anybody know how to get the project path so that I can access the "MyFolder"?
Thanks in advance,
|
|
|
|
|
hi Salon,
try this...  Hope it works for u, if your folder resides on sever
Uri uri1 = new Uri(Application.current.host.sources,"../FolderPath/Nameoffile");
Regards
Samir Satardekar
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for Quick Reply,
I want physical path ....like "C:/Documents/MyDocuments/" in a string variable
i do not want localhost path.........
|
|
|
|
|
salon wrote: I want physical path ....like "C:/Documents/MyDocuments/" in a string variable
i do not want localhost path.........
Silverlight runs on the client end - it has no knowledge of absolute
physical paths on what I'm assuming is your server.
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Thanks for ur kind and quick support....
My problem is solved....
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
