|
Browsing around the web (While working  ) I found this beautiful page which gives an overview of the most creepy and crappy web pages. So what on earth made the webmasters putting such creepy stuff up to a web server (they wasted a lot of space, IMO)?
Find the creepiest pages of the web[^]
Note: I am not responsible for any eye cancers or serious health problems you may get after viewing the link 
|
|
|
|
|
Idd Jeezus came to mind. Ah my eyes  .
|
|
|
|
|
Haiti News Network is the most pathetic, real innovative work 
|
|
|
|
|
They bring up the most earth-shaking new, I suppose 
|
|
|
|
|
This site (which I have to use on occasion) uses Flash in the tab controls (be sure you have your volume turned up for this). The best I can tell, it's the only use of Flash on the site. So someone thought "this site is dull without little clicky noises; let's use Flash!" during development? I'm sure there are worse examples (open invite for examples), but this is simply overkill at best. Also, I have no idea why it's ftp, but whatever.
ftp://ftp.relius.net/Administration/quantech/RA170/RA170News/Default.htm[^]
|
|
|
|
|
My favorite part is how the tabs are stacked.
I cannot imagine putting all that work into a sound effect and then leaving it visually ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
And sluggish. Don't forget it's a sluggardly site as well.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Someone learned to play with a new toy and figured they would just have to use it on the next project.  
It's moments like this that make me wish we had a double face-palm emoticon.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
This document and the software it describes may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form whatsoever without the written permission of SunGard.
I reproduced a part of the website on my screen, using a browser, by clicking the link.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
The FBI will be visiting you this afternoon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there, the link is broken ( could they be embarrassed ? )
|
|
|
|
|
Weird... It seems to be working for me as of right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Still down for me , get a 404 error - weird !!
|
|
|
|
|
+5 for the use of the word 'Egregious'!
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, it just really seemed to be the best word to sum up my feelings there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VallarasuS wrote: Wait! What would you answer if such question was fired at you?
Probably the answer they were looking for:
An exe requires a fixed entry point, so the loader can work out where start execution. A dll lacks this entry point and therefore the loader can't work out where to start.
Other than that, I don't think there are any important differences between an exe and dll, though I could be wrong about that.
|
|
|
|
|
DLLs can have standards-specified entry points too, for example the functions used for COM registration/deregistration. But yes, they don't have a 'main method' which is directly linked to from the file header. I think if you went with that answer to such an idiotic question they'd just not get it though.
|
|
|
|
|
DllMain()
[edit]
Oh, and check out the /ENTRY option on the linker too.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong forum?
I'd say that those are the operating system rules ... an exe is an executable file and a dll is a library (the clue's in the name).
|
|
|
|
|
BobJanova wrote: Wrong forum?
Have you missed the signature?
It does not have a main method! - the interviewer said!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I don't read signatures as part of the post.
|
|
|
|
|
No one does 
|
|
|
|
|
I just did 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
